User talk:Bitazeighami

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Melanie Bahlo has been reverted. Your edit here to Melanie Bahlo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://, https://www.science.org.au/past-winners/2009-awardees) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Meiloorun. I noticed that in this edit to Melanie Bahlo, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 04:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Follow up
It appears that you're participating in the Wikibomb2016, an editathon for Australian women STEM academics! Welcome to Wikipedia! I see someone has already posted a welcome template on your user page (above), but I wanted to welcome you and say that if you have any questions I'd be happy to assist you. One thing I would recommend you and your fellow Wikibomb2016 editors look at is WP:PROF which is a notability guideline specifically for academics. Unfortunately, not everyone is considered "notable" enough to have their own Wikipedia article (see the general notability guidelines as well). Figuring out Wikipedia's rules and bureaucracy can be frustrating, so feel free to ping me by using  when you reply to this message or you can come to my user talk page at User talk:EvergreenFir if you have any questions. Cheers!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Tea House Invite
 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melanie Bahlo
Hello Bitazeighami,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Melanie Bahlo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dschslava Δx  parlez moi  05:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Melanie Bahlo article
Hello, thanks for writing this! The article's been kept and edited to match Wikipedia's manual of style.

As a few recommendations, if creating an article for the first time, it's best to look at featured articles - supposed to be Wikipedia's best - on similar topics to give you some ideas on what to aim for, also look at the notability guideline - Wikipedia's guideline on good subjects for articles. Few suggestions on what to aim for next time: Otherwise best wishes, let me know if any questions or thoughts. Blythwood (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) If you're writing an article and you're not that experienced, keep it short. Six sentences is probably a good maximum.
 * 2) Add some inline citations and a reflist. An article should have about five citations, no more than one (or two, maybe) self-authored.
 * 3) Aim for at least six categories.
 * 4) Don't bother with a full list of society memberships and grants - this isn't a CV - maybe focus on work and most notable papers.

Hi
After all that above - another one - If you have any difficulty, most of the above is generic and not Australian - in Australia we have an editing community that is very supportive and editors who are keen to help and speak.

Please never be discouraged!


 * The Australian noticeboard is at Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board
 * The South Australian project can be contacted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_South_Australia
 * The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.

We look forward to your involvement with more editing/exploring wikipedia, and welcome on board !!! JarrahTree 02:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)