User talk:Bitbleed

March 2023
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Ginkgo biloba for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. ''... and Talk:Turmeric. An encyclopedia presents the facts established by high-quality reviews, especially for medical information. See WP:MEDASSESS. There are no review publications, no reputable clinical guidelines, and no government regulatory agencies recommending the use of ginkgo biloba or turmeric as medical therapies.

Also, do not use talk pages to vent your misinformed points of view. See WP:NOTFORUM, WP:TALKNO.'' Zefr (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Wow dude. I wonder why those "reputable clinical guidelines, government regulatory agencies" etc are NOT using a cheap, generic compound that has the potential to treat a variety of debiases and they are advising against it. Surely there is no bigger conspiracy to make money, there are no lobbying efforts, especially none behind closed doors!
 * There are just conspiracy theories for crazy people. Wikipedia only publishes agreed upon narratives despite medical evidence being to the contrary. Because #logic
 * Seriously, how do you people sleep at night, knowing you're willfully lying and misinforming people? and you have the absolute hypocrisy to call me misinformed even though I cited almost a dozen medical studies publishes on reputable journals that literally proves Ginkgo page is full of disinformation?
 * Guess you love to let the fox protect the hen house. Bitbleed (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

I blanked your user page, which is not to be used as if we are a web hosting service. The user page is for material that is related to your contributions to Wikipedia, and I guess it was--but your activities on Wikipedia fell outside the scope of what Wikipedia allows. Please do not confuse us with a social media site. Drmies (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Wow. Stunning comment. Apparently you're saying citing medical studies is misinformed points of view, but parroting the same false narrative despite the scientific evidence is now the norm on Wikipedia, and you wonder why nobody trusts this shithole anymore.
 * Keep your shithole, protect it and make it a bigger shithole than it already is. Bitbleed (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 23:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)