User talk:Bittertruthnavin

Speedy deletion of Mero Guff
A tag has been placed on Mero Guff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 01:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I read the note you left at Talk:Mero Guff. The reason the page was deleted was that it did not have any references such that independent, arm's-length, third party experts testify to the notability of the topic.  In general, it is very difficult to have a blog be the subject of a Wikipedia article; it would pretty much have to have been the topic of attention from national-level or international-level media.  I suggest you look at WP:Why was my article deleted? for more information and hints on how to proceed.  Accounting4Taste: talk 01:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)