User talk:BizIntelAnalyst

Analytic Solutions
A tag has been placed on Analytic Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Analytic Solutions and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Binary TSO ??? 14:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Analytic solutions
A tag has been placed on Analytic solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  01:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Analytic solutions
I have nominated Analytic solutions, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Analytic solutions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Analytic Solutions
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Analytic Solutions, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/analytic-solutions.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Analytic Solutions
A tag has been placed on Analytic Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ironholds (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Audinator, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. No more advertising, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Audinator


A tag has been placed on The Audinator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. UnbelievableError (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Audinator for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Audinator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Audinator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neither in the article nor on my talk page did you cite any sources to show the notability of this product. We can't just take your word for it that "everyone in the industry knows about it." NawlinWiki (talk) 01:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Something more personal than a template
I am taking the time to add something other than an point-and-click template here in hopes that you will read and consider it.

Your contributions lead me to believe that you may have a conflict of interest when editing articles related to Analytic Solutions and their products/services. While I cannot see the deleted edits, all of the contributions I can see promote Analytic Solutions or one of their products.

While I have nothing against you, the company or the product, I must say that your edits lead me to question whether you are here to build an encyclopedia or not.

As a sign of good faith, I will point you to WP:BFAQ which has some good advice on keeping an article you created from being deleted. While that section deals with rescuing an article about an organization, the same strategies would apply for an article about a product. The rest of the page may be useful to you as well. - UnbelievableError (talk) 02:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

No one offered you cookies?!?!?!
Hello, BizIntelAnalyst, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place " " on this page and someone will drop by to help. Roodog2k (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.