User talk:Bizflyer

Regarding your edit to Parkinson's disease:
Your recent edit to Parkinson's disease (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences frequent malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of shared IP ranges or new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 11:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Spam
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JFW | T@lk  11:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks.  JFW |  T@lk  13:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I have added a number of links to http://www.epgonline.org as reference points to medical or disease entries within Wikipedia this is not a form of Advertising and I would like to know on what basis Jfdwolff has 'decided' that it is?


 * I have replied on my talkpage. JFW | T@lk  20:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)#


 * I am sorry if you are disappointed by your experiences. I hope you will stay long enough to get to grips with Wikipedia's conventions and ways of working, and find yourself able to add useful content (not a bunch of links) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is under siege from spammers, especially on the medical pages, so people may be a bit quick on the draw. You should however familiarize yourself with External links and it would be as well not to start accusing people of anything, as Wikipedia is supposed to assume editors are acting in good faith (but can make mistakes, especially if unfamiliar with WIkipedia policies). A number of independent users, not administrators, without consulting each other, each decided your links were inappropriate and removed them, especially because you seem to have done little article editing except to add links to just one site. If you think they are appropriate, please discuss each proposal on the talk page for each article. I would recommend adding a few hundred edits with good factual content before considering suggesting any mass addition of links, however. Idontthinkso 21:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)