User talk:Bizzle1234

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 18:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Strategy for Operation Herrick
Can you explain why this information warrants its own article, as opposed to a section within Operation Herrick? Operation Herrick already seems to be a fairly narrow topic; splitting off individual elements from it seems unnecessary. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 18:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Part of my concern is that it appears to be a single source article. It would be equally informative to link the single reference you've provided in the External Links section from Operation Herrick. The article seems to be mostly a paraphrase of its references. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 18:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The Operation Herrick page seems to be attempting to be a factual history of Operation Herrick. The thing is this, the strategy for Herrick will change over time, and bears no relation to the missions planned and actually conducted on the ground. Along with the Rules of Engagement, it is the aiming post that helps shape the missions and engagements, and is logically separate from the actual ground truth. The actual strategy for Herrick will not be public and can never be public, the official statements made by Gordon Brown on the "strategy" are riddled with politics. I'm currently unpicking the politics and statements of actual missions from the substance of the strategy which is rather cleverly hidden. I've tried not to paraphrase the reference and I've tried to re-group the literature into the seven questions process followed by the military to begin to get a feel for that strategy. I have not actually finished, but got distracted, and I thought I had saved as a draft not as an actual page! Ops springs to mind.--Bizzle1234 (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Page move
Please see: William Westbury (provost). Pre-nominal titles are not used in  Wikipedia page names. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I have userfied this article to User:Bizzle1234/William Westbury (provost). It's been a couple of hours in main space and risks getting  deleted at  any  time. You will  be able to  develop it  in safety and then feel  free to  move it  back  to  main space when it's finished. If you have any questions, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on  my  talk  page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Systems thinking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Open System. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)