User talk:Bjanis

CeraSport‎
A tag has been placed on CeraSport‎, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of CeraSport‎ and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. --Joe Sperrazza (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Chart
It looked like spam, and was ugly. As you may be aware, the USDA allows a great deal of slop (which somehow always favors the company) in the nutrition label. If you feel the information has encyclopedic value, I suggest making it in text form, and providing a third party source for proof that the product contains what you proport. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 13:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)