User talk:Bjaypee

check this link to vote for Badaga Project and Nice start and good edits but you have to learn a few basic edit formulas..... may be you ll get tat soon..... because admins may here mercilessly delete the contents if we go against the guidelines of wikipedia... do ur work.. congrats.... --JAIKAYY 14:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Badaga Hattis
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Badaga Hattis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://badaga.wordpress.com/badaga-villages-nakku-betta-hattis/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Badaga Hattis and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Badaga Hattis, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Badaga Hattis with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Badaga Hattis. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Badaga Hattis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Dpmuk (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thank you for responding. I'm afraid that we cannot restore page unless you take one of the steps above to license it compatibly with our site. Your site's license is not compatible, as we permit commercial reuse of Wikipedia. Since you own the copyright, we would need to you to verify that it is licensed under both CC-By-SA and GFDL. (We can only use content that is licensed under CC-By-SA only if the copyright belongs to somebody who did not personally contribute it here.) If you choose to provide a compatible license, please let me know at my talk page and I can restore the article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I realize that this requirement may be disconcerting, but Wikipedia is a private website, and you do need to follow its policies to contribute. It is policy on Wikipedia that content previously published elsewhere must be verifiably public domain or compatibly licensed. I'm sorry if you find this process difficult, but as we have no way of verifying that you own copyright within Wikipedia (this is a legal matter, and we cannot simply take a user's word for it, even if we have no reason to doubt it), we have no recourse but to follow these processes. Please let me know if you need more information on how this is done. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)