User talk:Bjcjj61

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Richard III of England. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —— SerialNumber  54129  16:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Specifically - you are inserting information and breaking a template on Richard II of England. Please familiarize yourself with how to edit on wikipedia - particularly the links above about edit warring. When you are reverted (i.e. when your information is removed) it is considered bad form to reinsert the information. The proper way to handle being reverted is to take your concerns to the talk page of the article - i.e. Talk:Richard III of England and discuss with the editors reverting you. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. —— SerialNumber  54129  19:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Richard III
Richard the III was Roman Catholic.As the Church of England did not exist until Henry the VIII broke from Rome. Bjcjj61 (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read this discussion on religion in infoboxes; and don't edit war... ——  SerialNumber  54129  19:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)