User talk:Bjdla2012

Bjdla2012, you are invited to the Teahouse
City of license	Lafayette, LA Channels	Analog: 6 (VHF) Digital: 32.1 (UHF) Affiliations	Independent, ThisTV Owner	Delta Media Corporation First air date	1991 Former callsigns	K21DM (1990-1995) KLFT-LP (1995-2009) KXKW-CA (2009) Former affiliations	The Box (1991-1999) Pax, via KDCG-LP (1999-2004) UATV (2004-2006) The Sportsman Channel (2006-2009) Transmitter power	15,000 watts Class	A Facility ID	33177 Transmitter coordinates	30°20′32.00″N 91°58′32″W

KXKW (TV)
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, KXKW (TV), is copied from another Wikipedia page, KXKW-LP. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

SSN stands for Soul of the South TV network. Yes I did copy kxkw tv sometime last year as a way of making the difference between which one was Thistv and the analog 6 which is 87.7 radio with the weather. KXKW LP is nothing but an analog station. I did this only to make sure people knew the difference which one was the actual station from the analog one.

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KLWB (TV), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Bjdla2012

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K39JV


The article K39JV has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Translator station, not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2018 (UTC)