User talk:Bjeromin

Speedy deletion nomination of MrTopHatPiggy
Hello Bjeromin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MrTopHatPiggy for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 22:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

SolarFrost Stuff
Hello, I’ve just read this article and I’m a bit concerned that it doesn't have any citations. That worries me since without proof that this person is notable, meaning covered enough in media to get a Wikipedia article on them, the article may get deleted. Are there any extra citations you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool. Any questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SolarFrost Stuff
Hello Bjeromin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SolarFrost Stuff for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Julietdeltalima  (talk)  23:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Drill yourself


A tag has been placed on Drill yourself requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Erick Shepherd (talk) 03:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The pyrocynical effect
Hello Bjeromin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The pyrocynical effect for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 04:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh, Antarctica


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bangladesh, Antarctica, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Jake Brockman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KFC have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KFC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 10:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)