User talk:Bjh21

Greetings! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you have questions or doubts of any sort, do not hesitate to post them on the Village Pump, somebody will respond ASAP. Other helpful pages include: Have fun! --Jiang 20:58 15 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * Welcome, newcomers
 * How does one edit a page
 * Manual of style
 * Naming conventions

beautyvash
Hi,

I've tagged the page you edited for deletion. This is a fairly obvious case of non-notability.

Regards, Lotsofissues 08:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Template:delete
Thanks for the catch - I had been going through all of the csd's - some of which appeared to include various Template:Delete related notices. -SV|t 17:26, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Bere Alston railway station
Thanks for the photo -- and the correction to my 'senior moment' re Calstock/Callington! -- Picapica 21:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Falmouth Docks railway station
Thanks for the tips. I have now loaded the next batch (working eastwards from Bodmin Parkway railway station to St Germans but skipping Liskeard for now).

Geof Sheppard 13:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for editing my pages, regards AshLin 18:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry!
I was actually going to put it back. Its not the station that is in the Hertfordshire boundary but Ashwell village itself. This was a bit of a mix up. Simply south 19:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Alabama Public Radio and user namespace
I see you deleted the link to a user namespace in Alabama Public Radio. I haven't seen this before. Is there a Wikipedia policy against linking to user namespaces? What might be the rationale behind that? Thanks any further clarification. --Jeremy Butler 15:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know of a settled policy in this area, but WP:SELF covers very similar ground: article pages shouldn't contain links that are specific to the fact that the article is part of Wikipedia. That you are a Wikipedia user may be significant while that article is in Wikipedia, but is irrelevant if the article is copied to another site, printed out, or what-have-you.  Of course, if you're sufficiently notable, there should be a page at Jeremy Butler about you.  --bjh21 16:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That makes sense.  Hadn't see the WP:SELF policy before.  (And, no, I don't reckon I'm sufficiently notable!) --Jeremy Butler 18:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Rude forcing
Re your comment at Hinckley railway station (edit history): "Forcing thumbnail sizes is generally rude". I had no idea! Background to this notion? And what are the permissible exceptions to this generalization? Most thumbnails in Wp appear to me to be posted with an indicated size – whether "forced" or not I cannot tell. Or have I just led a particularly sheltered life? -- Picapica 23:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC) (doubtless often, but seldom knowingly, rude)

Small request
I have just created an article on Welwyn Viaduct. ?You seem to add railway photos so could you add one of Welwyn Viaduct please. Sorry to bother you. Simply south 16:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Simply south 19:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:John Hemming MP.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:John Hemming MP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

County Durham
Perhaps of interest to you: Talk:County Durham/Archive 1. Argovian (talk) 00:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File names
I've been unhappy with the changes you have been making to image names, as your changes appear to remove the explicit credit to Geograph or wherever the image was uploaded from. I am therefore very pleased to see that you've started editing filenames to the style "Description-description-description (Geograph 1234567)" which achieves the best of both worlds. Thank you. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That was part of why I changed my practice, though the main reason was simply that if I always include the Geograph image ID then I don't have to think about whether it might be necessary for disambiguation. That gives me more brain to spare for making sure the rest of the name is sensible. --bjh21 (talk) 23:12, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Taking that a step further, you could simply add something meaningful to the naming convention Geograph ask us to use, which would be easier for you and courteous to them, eg "Geograph-1234567 by Fred Bloggs" becomes "Geograph-1234567 by Fred Bloggs. Southerly view from Waterloo Platform 7". I might even start doing so myself! All the best, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you point me to the request from Geograph regarding filenames on Commons? I haven't seen it.  I'd prefer not to have a name that begins with the default filename because that creates more noise when searching for files with the default name. --bjh21 (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Basically, it is implicit, as that's what it defaults to, also if you start the download process it asks if you will please use the routine which stamps the image with copyright info. Wikipedia rejects this. I see what you mean about noise at the beginning of filenames, so it would be equally easy to reverse it, so "Geograph-1234567 by Fred Bloggs" becomes "Southerly view from Waterloo Platform 7, source Geograph-1234567 by Fred Bloggs." Dave DavidAHull (talk) 03:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you're reading an awful lot into a Content-Disposition header. I see the default filename as a way to ensure that the (licence-required) attribution stays attached to the file, in the same way that the stamping process embeds it in the image data.  Neither of these is necessary on Commons because Commons file description pages hold the same information.  This is borne out by the fact that in the Wikipedia section of Geograph's reuse.php, the only image link is to the full-res unstamped version, and there's a suggestion to use geograph2commons whose file-naming convention I've adopted.
 * Anyway, I've run out of files to rename now, so this is a bit academic. I do have a couple of bot ideas that might care about naming of files from Geograph: I'll let you know if/when they come up for approval. --bjh21 (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Picture renaming
Sorry, noted for future uploads. Mark83 (talk) 17:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)