User talk:Bjhodge8

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Bjhodge8! Thank you for your contributions. I am Chipmunkdavis and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CMD (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Small Potatoes (grammar) reply
Hey Bjhodge8, sorry for the late reply. It looks like the matter which you brought up has been addressed, so well done for that. With regards to your talkpage post, Checkingfax responded to the way you presented and formatted your post. As you say in the post itself, it was an "overly prolix diatribe". Overly prolix diatribes are, of course, not the best way to get across a point or make a suggestion. Your odd and inconsistent spacing before and after punctuation marks was also unhelpful in getting your message across. It's important to remember that while the talkpages are far more casual than articles, they still benefit from clean and clear communication, especially as like the articles they will be read by editors from different backgrounds and different forms of English. You are correct not to edit revert, but you are incorrect that one occasion like that should put you off making changes yourself, as noted by Corinne. At any rate, your talkpage post did in the end lead to the problem being solved, so the process does work. Best of luck in your future edits, CMD (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * On the List of United States Marine Corps acronyms and expressions page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=729417583 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F729417583%7CList of United States Marine Corps acronyms and expressions%5D%5D Ask for help])

formatting edits
You didn't ask a specific question, but I assume you are interested in formatting citations. My advice is to take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners; the videos at that page explain how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes without having to bother with the code of citation templates such as Template:Cite book or Template:Cite web. Of course you can also take a look at the template pages themselves for the documentation. For a quick overview of more general formatting, try the WP:Cheatsheet. Huon (talk) 15:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Cybele
I hope I didn't come over as defensive on the talk-page; but I probably was, and that's a little embarrassing. Your argument and presentation were sound. Regards, Haploidavey (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Call to Mentor
Given the span of time evinced in many Talk Pages(up to 15 yrs. in some cases), would you, in your own professional/personal editorial capacity, respond to surprisingly aged comment entries? If not, why, and, what would be a sensible cut-off point within a WP context?Bjhodge8 (talk) 20:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * That depends on context. Is the issue still current, or has the article changed in the meantime? Do you think something needs to be done or have even done something related to the old comment? Have there been subsequent discussions?
 * I would generally not respond to discussions that have been stale for more than a month unless I'm doing something on that issue that's worth commenting on - then I might just as well add to an old section on the talk page instead of creating a new one, provided there aren't many other threads posted afterwards - if the section I'd be adding something to is too far removed from "current", other editors are much more likely to simply miss my comments, and starting a new thread may be more appropriate than resurrecting an old one. Huon (talk) 21:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help. I'll try to suss it out as you suggest. I do formal clean-up and random cite.tag work and, as such, regularly encounter long abandoned(years not months) articles and accompanying talk pages. It takes a good while to realize the utter vastness in virtual space and time of WP, and what it has become.Bjhodge8 (talk) 02:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)