User talk:Bji2006

Election infoboxes
Hello. Please could you stop adding additional parties to the Thai election infoboxes. The way you are doing it is haphazard and making a mess.

The infoboxes should either just include the main parties, or include all of them. If you wish to do the latter, I would suggest you use Infobox legislative election, which is designed to be used for elections with multiple parties. Number  5  7  14:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * No i use over 30 minuts on every one why do you not do it Bji2006 (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop bulling 2007 Election the 2 partys came widt 25 and 37 seates Bji2006 (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Why do you Even care i am a politcal youtober That worksmost widt thai Elections you live in the uk Bji2006 (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added all 7 partys in 2007 thai Election please do not remove all of them Bji2006 (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thailand is a 5 Party + system Bji2006 (talk) 14:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I have to Ask you somthing
 * 1 Why do you care about Norway Election if you are from england
 * 2 the same but Thailand Bji2006 (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As I suggested earlier, if you want to add all the parties (rather than just the main ones), I would suggest you use Infobox legislative election, which works much better with multiple parties. Infobox election is not great for anything over three parties as it becomes too large.
 * I am interested in elections from all over the world. Where you are from gives you no more rights to edit an article than anyone else. Number   5  7  14:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I am politcal history nerd Bji2006 (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If like this remove Green Party and Peoples Party of Canada from 2015 2019 2021 they are minery partys Bji2006 (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I use Wikipedia all day and Edit but you are romoving every thing That i Edit Bji2006 (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You know i am for democrsy so lets stay nutral you dont remove my Edits i dont remove your Edits Bji2006 (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You dont yous youtobe do you i do Politics Bji2006 (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And why remove Buhumjathai Party from 2011 Election i was the third largest political Party in thai Election widt nearly 3 million votes and 34 Seats and 3.0% Bji2006 (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Its looks like i have found my politcal rival Bji2006 (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As Thailand is a multi-party system, I would suggest using the infobox used articles like 2021 Dutch general election or 2019 Belgian federal election. As you can see, it is much more compact.
 * Re the 2011 election article, the first two parties received 16 and 11 million votes and won 265/159 seats. The Bhumjaithai Party received 1.2m votes and only 34 seats, while the Chartthaipattana Party received 0.9m votes and won 19 seats. To me, this election has a clear "top two" parties, and if you want to include the Bhumjaithai Party, I think you should include all the smaller ones (hence the suggestion to use the infobox used on the Dutch and Belgian articles – this is typically used for countries where more than nine parties regularly win seats in elections (which is the case in Thailand). In Canada only five/six parties win seats, so all parties winning seats are included. Number   5  7  21:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Why remove Puea Pandin Party That got nearly 2 million votes and 5.4% of the vote and 25 mp Bji2006 (talk) 06:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Because, similar to the above explanation, while Puea Pandin received 1.98m votes and 25 seats, the top two parties got 14m votes and 165/232 seats, so they are clearly well above the rest (and Thai Nation won more seats than Puea Pandin despite receiving fewer votes). Number   5  7  21:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thai is what is best for me i think so leave me alone and stop removing ewerthing i Edit Bji2006 (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not how Wikipedia works. If you make a mess of an article or make changes which I don't believe are an improvement, I am allowed to revert you. Number   5  7  21:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * At least you didnt reverse Edit 1979 thai Election Bji2006 (talk) 03:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Because there are no clear largest parties in that election. However, the decision to include Chart Thai and Thai Citizen but not Seritham and the People's Nation Party seems bizarre and illogical. Similarly, why not include Siam Democrat Party in the 1983 infobox? Why not use Infobox legislative election and include all of them?
 * Also, you are introducing several errors into the articles:
 * Numbers should be written 2,395,795 not 2.395.795 (i.e. use commas not full stops)
 * Seats should not be capitalised (48 seats not 48 Seats)
 * Do not say "Tbd" when you don't know the party leader name. Just leave it blank. TBD means something to be determined in the future.
 * Personal names are capitalised, so "Kriangsak Chamanan" not "Kriangsak chamanan"
 * In the seat change section, the icon goes before the number, not after (so 4 not 4 )
 * If you could clean up your additions, that would be appreciated. Number   5  7  10:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Why remove cahrt thai pattana from 1996 thai Election they got over 7 million votes and 53 Seats and 12.38% Bji2006 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The same as the other elections you asked about. In 1996 the Democrat and New Aspiration Party received 18/17m votes and won 123/125 seats. Chart Thai received 7m votes and won 52 seats; it makes no sense to include them and not Thai Nation (6m votes, 39 seats). Either include all the parties that won seats using Infobox legislative election or stick to the top two. Number   5  7  10:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This are your ideas so leave me alone Bji2006 (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Why are you copying me and why remove the Party That got just 500 votes less then the red electoral allaince Bji2006 (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Because they didn't win a seat. Number   5  7  10:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I have put Red Electoral Alliance on 1997 to 2013 Norway Election please do not remove them Bji2006 (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As I've tried to explain to you multiple times, parties that did not win seats are not usually included, hence why the Red Party/Electoral Alliance was not already included. If you want to change established practice or a change of yours is reverted, you are expected to try and gain consensus for your change through discussion, not repeatedly try and make the same change (see WP:BRD). Please stop this. Number   5  7  14:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thai is not fair i hate you Bji2006 (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I have frends in parliament of Norway so I know that the majority does not want the threshold lowered Bji2006 (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * i will do later Today or tomrow i am sick Bji2006 (talk) 10:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And the sosalist left party widt the agremdt widt norrway govermedt that you removed that you said did not make any sens is axtualy true and there was a paln tomlower the reshodl from 4% to 3% but the majoriteyndid no want it i know as i have contacts and your so stupid Bji2006 (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kla Party


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kla Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 11:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chonlanan Srikaew


A tag has been placed on Chonlanan Srikaew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 11:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thai Sang Thai


A tag has been placed on Thai Sang Thai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 11:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chonlanan Srikaew


The article Chonlanan Srikaew has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Stephen! Coming... 11:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March 1992 Thai general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trang. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your edit on 2022 Swedish general election
Hi, I've reverted your edit on the article about the Swedish general election. Please avoid adding unsourced information, as Ulf Kristersson did not lose re-election, and neither did the Green Party co-chairs not run. Thanks. Lamaredia (Kasper D.L) (talk) 13:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Du kan bare skirive Svensk wis du will jeg kjønner ka du sier jeg er fra Norge Bji2006 (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Siden du er fre Sverige hvorfor har ikke det vert oppdatering siden 11:00 tiden i Sverige Bji2006 (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Kem er Sverige sin neste staminister Bji2006 (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Og hvorfor blir parti stemmer slettet hele tiden på engelsk siden Bji2006 (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Korson har ikke alle stemmene blid telt bare 95% det har vert 20 timer Bji2006 (talk) 14:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * De sista rösterna räknas först på onsdag/torsdag, när utlandssvenskarnas röster, samt vissa förtidsröster, räknas. Därmed så sker det ingen uppdatering på röstantalen sedan dess. Gällande röster som tagits bort på engelska sidan vet jag inte dessvärre, tror de döljer preliminära resultat fram tills det är färdigräknat. Lamaredia (Kasper D.L) (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Utöver detta, just nu är det oklart vem som blir statsminister. Det beror på resultat på onsdag, samt vem som kan få nog med stöd i riksdagen. Det beror helt enkelt på vilka avtal som sluts. Lamaredia (Kasper D.L) (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Kem har vunnet 2022 riksdag valg det har vert 3 dager siden valget Bji2006 (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Formatting numbers etc
Hello. A few tips for editing: Cheers, Number   5  7  14:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Percentages use a full stop for the decimal place, not a comma (so 1.32% not 1,32%)
 * There should be a comma between the last election's percentage and seats (so 1.32%, 1 seat not 1.32% 1 seat)
 * Swings are calculated as percentage points (pp) not %, so the swing from one election to the next is written 1.11pp not 1.11%

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Communist Party of Norway
 * added a link pointing to Minority
 * Social Democratic Labour Party of Norway
 * added a link pointing to Minority

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, Bji2006. I noticed that your recent edit to September 1992 Thai general election added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 03:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I found the photo on Thai Wikipedia Bji2006 (talk) 03:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

That doesn't mean English Wikipedia can use it. It may have been uploaded only to Thai Wikipedia, in which case it will only show up there. It has to be uploaded to English Wikipedia or to Commons to show up here.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 21:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 Thai general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sukhothai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

2006 Thai general election
Hello. I saw you added the vote share of six parties that didn't win seats to the infobox. While the infobox is only meant to list parties that won seats, do you have the vote figures for the parties (rather than the percentage) so they can be added to the results table? Currently they are all groups as just "Other parties". Cheers, Number   5  7  13:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes
 * party 1 675.662 2.47%
 * Party 2 305.015 1.11%
 * party 3 292.895 1.07%
 * party 4 255.853 0.93%
 * party 5 146.680 0.54%
 * party 6 133.534 0.49%
 * party 7 125.008 0.46% Bji2006 (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * What's the source for this? Also, you have listed more parties (7) than you added to the infobox or mentioned in your edit summary (6), and the total of the votes above (1,934,647) doesn't add up to the same total as "Other parties" in the current results table (1,935,647). Cheers, Number   5  7  14:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I found the source, so no need to answer the above. However, it doesn't have the constituency figures. Any idea where a breakdown for those can be found? Cheers, Number   5  7  16:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Well yeah but Thai rak Thai party ran unopposed in most Constituency Around Thailand  Bji2006 (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There were 267,196	votes cast for other parties. Any idea where we could find out how that was divided between them? The 2006 election isn't listed in the CLEA database. Number   5  7  11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I know
 * 1 Thai farmer party 81.782 0.32%
 * 2 peoples power party did not filed candidates
 * 3 Thai citizens party 69.183 0.27%
 * 4 dharmacrsy party 56.274 0.22%
 * 5 Thai help Thai party 49.283 0.20%
 * 6 pattana chart Thai party did not filed candidates
 * 7 pandin Thai party 10.674 0.04% Bji2006 (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You could check Thai Wikipedia for provinces results and use google translate Bji2006 (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks - where can I find the provincial results on Thai Wikipedia? Number   5  7  20:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Well you Can writhe down the Election results
 * like this 2006 Bangkok general Election
 * then translate to Thai
 * การเลือกตั้งทั่วไปกรุงเทพมหานคร พ.ศ. 2549 Bji2006 (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately no such article exists on th.wiki. Can you provide a direct link? Cheers, Number   5  7  11:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)