User talk:Bkc2006

License tagging for Image:01-2001-varyag.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01-2001-varyag.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:01-2001-Ukraine-Yards.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01-2001-Ukraine-Yards.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- ReyBrujo 04:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image:11-2006-Dalian.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:11-2006-Dalian.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self-no-disclaimers to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 04:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:White house replica in china.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:White house replica in china.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Chinese "White House" replica
Hi Bkc2006. I am familiar with both the White House and the Huang Qiaoling's model of it. I have been in the White House many times, and teach history of architecture and decorative arts. The Chinese "White House" is quite a feat, and it is a very sincere compliment, but unfortunately it is not accurate. I find his building impressive and moving,a nd interesting that his fgovrnment allows it. I do not intend to demean the spirit of his project, though it has been criticised as egotistical. But Mr. Huang's project is best described as "fanciful interpretation." And, I would say he gets it as good as many American movies do, they are famous for having everyting in the wrong places. Which is strange because between books, and Library of Congress public doman photos, measured floorplan drawings, White House Historical Association publications, etc, anyone, with the money and attention to detail could get the building absolutely correct. Furnishing would be anohtter thing as even reproductions could cost in the hundreds of millions.

It does however merit an article. The representation of the Oval Office is placed in the central residence portion where the Blue Room should be. In fact the "Oval Office" is not even oval, it has straight walls on he sides, Please see:

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.timeinc.net/time/asia/covers/1101020923/photoessay/1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/1101020923/photoessay/index.html&h=297&w=450&sz=28&hl=en&sig2=xpMrjma4ejPvFO6o1F7mkw&start=4&um=1&tbnid=TgtOmFzv5Xy6AM:&tbnh=84&tbnw=127&ei=HsMSRobqDJ2uhATTtoy3CA&prev=/images%3Fq%3DChinese%2BWhite%2BHouse%2Breplica%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den%26sa%3DN The White House has no "Baroque sofa". The styles in the White House are: Federal, French Empire, Louis XVI, American Empire, Duncan Phyphe, Hepplewhite, Sheraton, Jacobean Revival, Queen Anne Revival, Herter Brothers, Belter, and Renaissance evival, and Rococo Revival. Your use of the word "immaculate" is fairly loose as the rug does not look like any of the rugs in the White House. For one it isn't oval, it is rounded on the ends with striaght sides. It is vaguely similar to President Clinton's but not at all like the one presently in use. the drapery is unlike anything that has hung in the White House. The lamps are mass-produced and have no corellation with any lighting in the real house. I am also concerend about the image, it does not qualify as "fair use."

An external shot here:

http://chake.chinatefl.com/images/sng_0034.jpg

this shows that the balustrade across the top and the Ionic columns supporting he portico are wrong. The Chinese model uses about 40 percent of the numbr of balusters in the actual building. CApitol3 21:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Varyag.jpg
is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Varyag.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:140 66 809823b44bbc4762.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:140 66 809823b44bbc4762.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Republic screen010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Republic screen010.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 06:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)