User talk:BlackDevil

Image source information
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I see you've uploaded several images without information on their source. If you cannot supply source information for these images, including Image:WhoisBond.jpg, Image:Bart2.gif, Image:Apelsin.jpg, they may be listed for speedy deletion after 7 days have passed.

If you own the copyright for any of these images (i.e., they are your own creative work or your own photographs), you can release them under one or several free licenses so that they can remain on Wikipedia. If you believe the image is under a free license or in the public domain, indicate this and why you think so on the image's page. If you obtained these images from copyrighted web sites, you may be able to assert fair use so the image may be used by Wikipedia. See Fair use to see if your image qualifies. If it does, you can replace the or  template on the image's page with one of Wikipedia's fair use templates. If an image remains without source and license for more than 7 days, it will automatically become a candidate for speedy deletion and may be removed from Wikipedia.

Images you may want to review include the following.


 * Please provide (detailed, if possible) source information, as well as a license or claim of fair use, for :Image:Apelsin.jpg, Image:Bart2.gif, Image:WhoisBond.jpg, Image:Rasputin-tree.jpg, Image:Shieldlogo.gif, Image:Ukr-Urk.jpg, and Image:OzzyOsbourne.jpg.
 * Please provide a license or a claim of fair use for Image:17594.jpg and Image:Book 1.jpg.
 * Please provide (detailed, if possible) source information for: Image:BillieJoeArmstrong.jpg and Image:MickeyRourke.jpg.

Thank you. Phoenix-forgotten 02:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vakarchuk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vakarchuk.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 19:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Бумбокс, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atomic1609 20:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Паша Гудімов, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atomic1609 20:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Removal of deletion tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. – Tivedshambo (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Speedy deletion of Template:Lee Profile
A tag has been placed on Template:Lee Profile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)