User talk:BlackHouseMixing

January 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 18:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Perhaps you can understand our skepticism when (so far) you wrote exclusively about a particular individual, openly disclosed that you have a conflict of interest with him (meaning that you have a personal or professional relationship with him), and your account name is that of his business, contrary to Wikipedia policy.


 * Any topic must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria to be considered worthy of inclusion. In general, a topic must have already received significant coverage in sources that Wikipedia deems reliable and independent of the topic itself. These criteria are further refined for music-related topics at Notability (music). Reliable sources are defined as sources that have an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. This heavily favours mainstream news organizations, academic press, and reputable publishers of books, magazines and newspapers.


 * Almost all social media sources are automatically disqualified as unreliable sources, because they consist of user-generated content that is self-published. In short, we have no interest in what a subject (person or organization) wishes to say about themselves. We care only about what third-party writers with no vested interest have chosen to publish about them. A list of commonly-discussed sources for music-related topics can be found at WikiProject Albums/Sources. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)