User talk:BlackJack/Archive 19

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1755 in English cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1755 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1751 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1751 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1752 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1752 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1752 in sports


A tag has been placed on Category:1752 in sports indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1753 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1753 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 10:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1754 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1754 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1755 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1755 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 10:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1727 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1727 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1732 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1732 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1737 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1737 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1744 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1744 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1794 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1794 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Brandon (cricketer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Brandon (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Brandon (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:English cricket seasons 1816 - 1863


A tag has been placed on Template:English cricket seasons 1816 - 1863 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Redundant. All of the linked articles have been merged into History of English cricket (1816–1863) per merger discussion."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1733 in English cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1733 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1733 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1733 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1734 in English cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1734 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1734 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1734 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1735 in English cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1735 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1735 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1735 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1736 in English cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1736 in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1736 in cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:1736 in cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English cricket seasons 1864 - 1889
Template:English cricket seasons 1864 - 1889 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English cricket seasons 1919 - 1945
Template:English cricket seasons 1919 - 1945 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English cricket seasons 1946 - 1968
Template:English cricket seasons 1946 - 1968 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct sports venues in Bedfordshire


A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct sports venues in Bedfordshire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk  07:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australian cricket seasons from 2000-01
Template:Australian cricket seasons from 2000-01 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Stacey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Stacey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Stacey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Artem.G (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Andrew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Andrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charles Andrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Artem.G (talk) 08:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Anguish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Anguish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charles Anguish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Artem.G (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Bache for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Bache is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Bache until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Artem.G (talk) 08:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Horace Bates for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horace Bates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Horace Bates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Artem.G (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Gamble


The article George Gamble has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:N"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Postage stamps of Cyprus


A tag has been placed on Category:Postage stamps of Cyprus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 21:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Beldham


The article George Beldham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT #5 - sourced only to a 19th century book that is part of a series consisting primarily of match statistics - see 9th Edition for an example"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * Charles Reed (cricketer)
 * Silas Cooper
 * John Jenner
 * Robert Quarme
 * Richard Welch (cricketer)
 * Thomas Liffen
 * John Bott
 * Harry Bridger
 * William Sturt
 * Richard Lawrence (cricketer)
 * John Beldham

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Games media has been nominated for merging
Category:Games media has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Razell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Razell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Razell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilledMammal (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Stearn


The article Thomas Stearn has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable, due to another non-notable Thomas Stearn being mentioned at Thomas Blinkhorn."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Pierpoint


The article Charles Pierpoint has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable due to ambiguous target; subject is mentioned at both List of English cricketers (1826–1840) and List of English cricketers (1787–1825)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Bentley (cricketer)


The article John Bentley (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Searle (Sussex cricketer)


The article Richard Searle (Sussex cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edmund Carter (cricketer, born 1785)


The article Edmund Carter (cricketer, born 1785) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry Page (cricketer)


The article Henry Page (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Shepheard


The article George Shepheard has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is not suitable, due to the existence of a racecar driver by the same name who is mentioned in several articles."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Walpole (cricketer)


The article Robert Walpole (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Humphrey Repton (cricketer)


The article Humphrey Repton (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Hooker (cricketer)


The article William Hooker (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Francis Mellersh (cricketer)


The article Francis Mellersh (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noah Mann junior


The article Noah Mann junior has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Ellis Bayly


The article Charles Ellis Bayly has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Wenman


The article George Wenman has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is not suitable, as this Wenman is mentioned at multiple valid targets, and a different George Wenman is mentioned at Knights of the Royal Oak"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Stevens (cricketer, born 1769)


The article John Stevens (cricketer, born 1769) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Schabner


The article Andrew Schabner has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is unsuitable, as both List of Marylebone Cricket Club players (1787–1826) and List of English cricketers (1787–1825) are valid targets."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Shackle


The article Thomas Shackle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is unsuitable, as there are multiple non-notable Thomas Shackle's who played Cricket."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Greenway


The article William Greenway has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is not suitable as other non-notable William Greenways exist, including at Akron Series in Poetry and Royal Charlotte (1774 ship)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Grinham


The article James Grinham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect is not suitable due to other James Grinham's being mentioned, including at 2004 Cambridge City Council election."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Goldham


The article John Goldham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable due to multiple valid targets."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Gibbons (cricketer)


The article John Gibbons (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Lane (cricketer)


The article Richard Lane (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Nicoll (cricketer, born 1770)


The article Thomas Nicoll (cricketer, born 1770) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Leycester


The article George Leycester has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable per WP:REDLINK; the MP by the same name is likely notable, but doesn't currently have an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Simmons (cricketer)


The article Richard Simmons (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Burgoyne (cricketer, born 1775)


The article Thomas Burgoyne (cricketer, born 1775) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Dampier


The article John Dampier has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable due to the mention of a different John Dampier at Alfred Dampier."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Mellish


The article Thomas Mellish has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Redirect not suitable due to others of the same name, some of whom may be notable. See 3rd General Assembly of Prince Edward Island."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Gouldstone


The article John Gouldstone has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Articles of Agreement


The article Articles of Agreement has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Alternative phrase already defined at Ship's articles, suggest redirect there. Note the talk page redirect Talk:Articles of Agreement to talk:Articles of Agreement (cricket) should also be deleted if unopposed."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darcyisverycute (talk) 07:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vivian Polley


The article Vivian Polley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet the notability guideline; most sources I find list him only as a player and not anything specifically notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (talk) 02:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Herbert Vigar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herbert Vigar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Herbert Vigar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SWinxy (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:English cricket seasons from 1598 to 1763 has been nominated for merging
Category:English cricket seasons from 1598 to 1763 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BoJó &#124;  talk  UTC 15:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English cricket seasons 1816 - 1863
Template:English cricket seasons 1816 - 1863 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English cricket seasons 1969 - 2000
Template:English cricket seasons 1969 - 2000 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1764 to 1786


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1764 to 1786 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1787 to 1815


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1787 to 1815 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1864 to 1889


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1864 to 1889 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1890 to 1918


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1890 to 1918 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1919 to 1945


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1919 to 1945 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1946 to 1968


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1946 to 1968 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English cricket seasons from 1969 to 2000


A tag has been placed on Category:English cricket seasons from 1969 to 2000 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh cricket in the 20th century


A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh cricket in the 20th century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh cricket in the 21st century


A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh cricket in the 21st century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Seasons in Welsh cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:Seasons in Welsh cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of Welsh cricket


A tag has been placed on Category:History of Welsh cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Herbert Sutcliffe 1935.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herbert Sutcliffe 1935.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 11:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Estonian domestic cricket competitions has been nominated for merging
Category:Estonian domestic cricket competitions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1741


A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1741 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of John Slingsby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Slingsby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Slingsby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hiram Slack (cricketer, born 1808) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiram Slack (cricketer, born 1808) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hiram Slack (cricketer, born 1808) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  21:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Yorkshire 1937.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yorkshire 1937.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 18:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of R. Roberts (Lancashire cricketer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. Roberts (Lancashire cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/R. Roberts (Lancashire cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:International cricket tours between England and India
Template:International cricket tours between England and India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Batagur baska (talk) 17:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Philately of Kuwait has been nominated for merging
Category:Philately of Kuwait has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Postage stamps of Estonia has been nominated for merging
Category:Postage stamps of Estonia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Postage stamps of Austria has been nominated for merging
Category:Postage stamps of Austria has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:English cricketers of the 21st century has been nominated for renaming
Category:English cricketers of the 21st century has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Dunlop (cricketer)


The article George Dunlop (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No claim of notability under WP:NCRICKET"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BrigadierG (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of West Indian pound for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Indian pound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/West Indian pound until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

"Wareford (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wareford_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Wareford (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Warren (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warren_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Warren (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Short (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Short_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Short (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"C. Onslow (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C._Onslow_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no C. Onslow (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Need (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Need_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Need (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Newland (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newland_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Newland (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"J. Macnamara (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Macnamara_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no J. Macnamara (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Maddon (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maddon_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Maddon (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Markham (MCC cricketer, 1791)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Markham_(MCC_cricketer,_1791)&redirect=no Markham (MCC cricketer, 1791)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Laurent (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laurent_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Laurent (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"J. Lewis (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Lewis_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no J. Lewis (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Jones (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Jones (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Jackson (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jackson_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Jackson (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Godfrey (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Godfrey_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Godfrey (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"J. Bushby (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Bushby_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no J. Bushby (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"J. Cockerill (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Cockerill_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no J. Cockerill (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Broughton (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Broughton_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Broughton (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Blair (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blair_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Blair (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Bonniface (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bonniface_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Bonniface (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Copden (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copden_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Copden (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Curtis (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Curtis_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Curtis (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Cooke (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooke_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Cooke (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Daley (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daley_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Daley (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Dark (MCC cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_(MCC_cricketer)&redirect=no Dark (MCC cricketer)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Cricket articles needing attention to tagging has been nominated for deletion
Category:Cricket articles needing attention to tagging has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:20th-century Bangladeshi cricketers has been nominated for deletion
Category:20th-century Bangladeshi cricketers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:21st-century English cricketers has been nominated for deletion
Category:21st-century English cricketers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:21st-century Bangladeshi cricketers has been nominated for deletion
Category:21st-century Bangladeshi cricketers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)