User talk:BlackMonkeys

Welcome!

Hello, BlackMonkeys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Clinton Daniel Penner, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Clinton Daniel Penner


A tag has been placed on Clinton Daniel Penner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clinton Daniel Penner, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  D u s t i *poke* 07:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clinton Daniel Penner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  D u s t i *poke* 07:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clinton Daniel Penner, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  D u s t i *poke* 07:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clinton Daniel Penner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you.  D u s t i *poke* 07:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * So, all you need to do is to get good secondary sources about you (not from your own website or YouTube videos). Newspaper articles, magazine articles, etc.  Pull out your scrapbook of press clippings about you and cite them and the article will stick around.  Let me know on my talk page if you'd like help formating your references so they look good once you decide which articles to use. :) Banaticus (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * So, all you need to do is to get good secondary sources about you (not from your own website or YouTube videos). Newspaper articles, magazine articles, etc.  Pull out your scrapbook of press clippings about you and cite them and the article will stick around.  Let me know on my talk page if you'd like help formating your references so they look good once you decide which articles to use. :) Banaticus (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I noticed you removed the speedy delete notice from Clinton Daniel Penner. As the page's creator, you shouldn't do that. I think the recent bout of reverts have been because you kept replacing the speedy delete template with your tag. I've added the speedy delete template and kept your, so that should put an end to those reverts. You can continue editing, but you shouldn't remove the speedy delete template. Also, if you haven't already, please consider reading Wikipedia's speedy deletion policy. Thank you. 184.56.92.166 (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Clinton Daniel Penner. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)