User talk:Black Eagle~enwiki

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. abakharev 02:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Hillary Rodham Clinton article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Mango juice talk 02:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hillary Rodham Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. MichaelMaggs 19:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Hillary_Rodham_Clinton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Furthermore, reinserting the same commentary multiple times may cause you to violate the three-revert rule, which can lead to a block. Sophrosune  (talk)  23:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

My information about Hillary Rodham Clinton is true and correct. At this time, I think that Events will prove me correct, and your other writers wrong over the next two years.

Removing Speedy Delete Notice
Please don't remove speedy delete notices, as you did at Freshmen (magazine). Thanks! --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 22:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Freshmen (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — P ilotguy (ptt) 02:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Space Shots
I've nominated Space Shots, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Space Shots satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Space Shots and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Space Shots during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk  05:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:SPACE_SHOTS_producerwww.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SPACE_SHOTS_producerwww.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk  02:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Black Eagle. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Black Eagle~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)