User talk:Black Feminist Anthroplogy

Draft Article
Hello, and welcome! It looks like you were starting article work on "Black Feminist Anthroplogy" in your user space. Just so you know, I moved that to the Draft space of Wikipedia, which is the better place for drafts in-progress. You can access it HERE. Generally the main User Page is just for basic information about you and your Wikipedia activities, and not really meant for articles. Feel free to Contact Me if I can be of any help! Crow  Caw 22:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Black Feminist Anthropology
Hi, I'm Kmccook. Black Feminist Anthroplogy, thanks for creating Black Feminist Anthropology!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is a little unclear, is Black Feminist Anthropology a book? Need citation if so. Suggest work on page for Dr.McClaurin along these lines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julianne_Malveaux Then link from that page to a page about the book/archive.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kmccook (talk) 00:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Black Feminist Anthropology
Hello, Black Feminist Anthroplogy,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Black Feminist Anthropology should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Black Feminist Anthropology.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Username warning
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. In brief:

There are four kinds of usernames that are specifically disallowed:
 * Misleading usernames imply relevant, misleading things about the contributor. Misleading names include those that imply you are in a position of authority over Wikipedia, or those that impersonate other people.
 * Promotional usernames are used to promote a group, company, product or website on Wikipedia.
 * Offensive usernames are those that offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult or impossible.
 * Disruptive usernames include outright trolling or personal attacks, or otherwise show a clear intent to disrupt Wikipedia.

I think your username may be a problem under one or more of these headings (you can find more details at Username policy), and this needs to be addressed.

There are several options available to you:
 * We can talk about this, here - if you're not sure how or why your username might not meet policy, disagree that there's a problem, or are not sure what alternative to use.
 * You can abandon the contributions made under this name and immediately create a new account that meets our username policy. Happy editing!
 * Or, if you want to keep your contributions history under a new name, visit Changing username and follow the instructions there.

Just so you know, if we can't resolve this on our own, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process. Thanks. Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Black Feminist Anthroplogy", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.
 * I've included both of our username warnings. It's just that your username, paired with the fairly promotional tone on the article, comes across like you are here to promote a specific book or viewpoint to the point where it could be seen as soapboxing/promotion. Changing your username would be a good way to start addressing these issues. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Black Feminist Anthroplogy concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Black Feminist Anthroplogy, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Black Feminist Anthroplogy


A tag has been placed on Draft:Black Feminist Anthroplogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.irmamcclaurin.com/resources/Web_Bio/MCCLAURIN%20BIO%201%2013%202015.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)