User talk:Black Kite/Archive06

'''To leave me a message, click the + symbol at the top of the page. I will usually reply on your talk page. '''

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #B0C4DE; border: 1px solid #000000; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;"
 * colspan="2" style="padding: 0;" |
 * style="width: 70%; background-color: #F0F8FF; border: 1px solid #000000; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |
 * style="width: 70%; background-color: #F0F8FF; border: 1px solid #000000; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |

My Userpage
It looks wonky on Firefox, but on IE it's fine, I've been going about seeing if anyone can fix it, and I thought you might be able to help me out and make it so it looks good on Firefox and IE. Cheers! Tyler Warren 22:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * For me, the text on the left side overlaps on the right. Maybe it's a FireFox option? Is there a WordWrap or something option I should turn on, so as to stop the text overlapping? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler Warren (talk • contribs) 22:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Young British Artists
I hope you don't mind but I moved Karsten Schubert back to the galleries section. This list includes individuals synonymous with their galleries, such as Maureen Paley and Sadie Coles (even though the gallery names are slightly different eg Interim Art, Sadie Coles HQ). The list of advocates consists of curators and critics and one influential teacher. Rest assured that I'm not part of the publicity arm of the (evidently re-launched) Karsten Schubert Gallery, apparently responsible for recent rewrites of the Karsten Schubert article.--Ethicoaestheticist 00:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Birmingham meetup
Hi there, I noticed you put your name down as interested in a Birmingham meetup. Just letting you know, the date is now set as Saturday 20th October. We really need input on where, and what time we will meet, so comments would be much appreciated on the page. Thanks.  Majorly  (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Trixen block
Indef block for one Talk page message? That seems to be a bit much given that the editor has a history of (minor) positive contributions and no prior history of misbehavior. It's your call but that seems a bit excessive to me. --ElKevbo 22:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Hi Eliminator. Thanks a lot for your support in my RfA and for the message of congratulations. Look forward to seeing you around, Number   5  7  16:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Curious
I saw your changes to the Pixies articles, and I'm wondering why you change them all to free use images, only to revert yourself a few minutes later? :) CloudNine 18:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Comprendo‎ and Gladys Knight sitting in a tree...
Hi, User:Comprendo isn't happy with Miss Knight merely being listed as a winner of the Ella award at Society of Singers. I have RV it twice, but don't want to get into an edit war, or break the 3RV rule. What should I do? Gareth E Kegg 15:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I deleted it again, but am now hiding under sandbags. See: Talk:Gladys Knight Gareth E Kegg 16:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yawn... Gareth E Kegg 00:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
  Click there to open your card! → → →  Dear , Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me. iride scent  (talk to me!)   20:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by  Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

RFA Thanks!
Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your block of Ixlikextoxdansex
Would you please comment at WP:AN/I? Thank you, Iamunknown 00:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
alright, maybe some of the things I did do qualify as "Vandalism", but the changes I made to Costa del Mar are actually valid. Most people who own a pair usually wear them on the back of their necks (Honestly, I think its stupid). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.68.248.208 (talk) 04:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Dinosaur
No problem - you're welcome! I checked back in the history, and it turned out an editor using AWB had deleted "%20"s from the url, which made it nonfunctional. J. Spencer 20:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate disambiguation pages
If you happen to know, can you tell me what the policy is on disambiguation pages that have essentially the same information? (Man, was that a poorly worded sentence!) The reason I ask is because of these two disambig pages: [] and []. The latter, which is a more inclusive dab page, contains all of the information included in the former. Should I blank the smaller page and redirect it to the larger page? Your advice is appreciated. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive'  21:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Done and done. --- RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  22:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

GHcool canvassing again
As you reverted the last attempt at canvassing by this user on the WP:Israel talk page, I thought you might be interested to see this. As an involved party in the Israel sphere I don't feel that I can take action, but I would like to see what an uninvolved admin thinks. Thanks, Number   5  7  20:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Ship names
Hello. Just wanted to leave a friendly note regarding a page move you recently made. We at WikiProject Ships renamed Katsuragi (aircraft carrier) back to Japanese aircraft carrier Katsuragi as per Naming conventions (ships). Please let us know if you have any questions or issues. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

MfD about the WikiProject_ROMacedonia
Hi, I noticed you voted for the project deletion. I'm sorry I noticed this thing a little bit late, please review my comments on the MfD page here and also here, I think we are going to make a big mistake if we delete a whole project because of the To do page dispute. I'm open for discussion. MatriX 22:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Thea Bowman
Sister Thea Bowman was well known in the United States. In fact she was on 60 Minutes with Mike Wallace and there was some talk about she being a candidate for sainthood plus there were 2 or 3 schools name after Sr. Thea. I am working on the article and if you do a search on the internet, Sr. Thea does come up. many times. Thany you- RFD 00:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Please give myself the benefit of the doubt.

Thea Bowman
Thank you for your kindness and understanding concerning Sister Thea Bowman and the article. Many thanks also for responding alsoRFD 00:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Maurice Boland
Why did you delete my page? please edit this with reply thanks
 * Replied on your talk page.  E LIMINATOR JR  01:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

dont really understand why it was deleted after reading guidelines? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morrybo (talk • contribs) 01:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922)
Greetings!

Please refer to the above page for a suggestion on getting this article back on track.

Cordially, Drieux 03:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan vandalism

 * Note: I've blocked User:Coolshamas 01 and the IP he used afterwards, and I *think* I've fixed all the page move mess. Can you check to make sure I've done it correctly?  Thanks,   E LIMINATOR  JR  13:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Seems good to me -- though you missed deleting Talk:Governor Of Pakistan, which is currently a re-direct. Also... if you check the history, this has been going on for a long, long time -- I'm not really sure 24 hours is long enough, but that's up to you. Actually... since it has been going on for such a long time, perhaps semi-protection is in order? Gscshoyru 13:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Deleted that one as well. I've got the page watchlisted, as it seems to be the only one this contributor is interested in, and if he starts again I'll do something more permanent.  E LIMINATOR  JR  13:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Gotcha. We'll see how this turns out, then. Gscshoyru 13:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * He's doing it again... I think this page is in serious need of long-term semi-protection. Gscshoyru 14:11, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

NeedThese marked as spam
I am currious why would would mark an article like [NeedThese] as spam but not one for say [Computer_Geeks]. What in your mind make one spam and one not. Both have the same information on the company... --Ahouglum 23:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

etoro speed deletion for advertising
what exactly was the advertising? there was no link, no screenshot and nothing else that qualifies as advertising. all links were taken from credible sources according to wikipedia guidelines. I'd be happy to change anything specific that might have make you think it was an ad, but for that you'd have to tell me what was wrong with the article instead of deleting it 2 minutes after I uploaded it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeDaurdan (talk • contribs) 18:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

I did get you mixed up with someone else, sorry about that. I'm working on improving the page as we speak. any tips you can give me from your experience would be appreciated. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.29.100 (talk) 12:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Unheeded Warning
A user Hungrywolf has been adding unencyclopedic information to Field Commander after being warned by you in the past. See new comments in this section for diffs.Game Collector 13:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Italian Game
I’m thinking there’s a need to re-open the page on the Italian Game (I’ve lodged a discussion here about it); do you have any objections? Moonraker12 14:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Why did you erase my article on Team America. We are a non- profit community, promoting online gaming for all ages, especially kids, to keep them out of trouble. If there was not enough info to start, sorry about that, I was giving other memebrs of our community a chance to get the page going. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr0pthr33 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Packet
Thanks for tidying Packet however, as it now stands, the data transmission sense and the early "State papers" sense are not included. Have you finished editing, yet? Vernon White '''. . . Talk''' 21:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. All the electronic "packet" stuff swamps the older meaning on searching. Is any merging possible? I am intending to tidy up the various shipping meanings of "Packet", as I have just read a useful book about the Falmouth Packet service. Vernon White  . . . Talk 21:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * ... and I think the Wiktionary page should link to the DAB page not "Wikipedia has an article on:

Packet (information technology)". Can it be done? Vernon White  . . . Talk 21:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply - " think you might be right, actually - it would probably be better if Packet led to the dab page rather than the IT meaning, thus moving Packet to Packet (data) or something along those lines.". can you do this, please? I am not sure that I grasp the technology.  Vernon White  . . . Talk 20:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Bomboy page?
Why are killing this page we want to make our guild leader a page so people can lean more about him. Plz stop doing this we have never been able to give him anything so plz just let us make this for him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Booman925 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandal
Re: User talk:Lizziebabes90 The user keeps adding the same thing, the number 2, over and over without any source. This has been discussed several times in the discussion page and in the previous AfD discussion about personal info of a living person and adding unsourced information. Even after warnings of adding unsourced material and warnings of vandalism, the user continued to do it. The user was previously warned on August 19, 2007 as well about adding unsourced material. Thanks. --  ALLSTAR    ECHO  01:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Three-revert_rule: reverts to remove clearly libelous material, or unsourced or poorly sourced controversial material about living persons (see Biographies of living persons). Thanks. --  ALLSTAR    ECHO  01:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Controversial because, as was discussed in previous AfD of this article, the subject of the article has stated publicly about not wanting personal information out because of all of the threats on his life he has gotten. I know it's crazy but we had a long discussion about this in the AfD and subsequent discussions on the article's talk page. The consensus was reached to not include ANY personal information without sources. I was giving Lizziebabes90 leeway that I don't care as long as it's sourced. Thanks. --  ALLSTAR    ECHO  01:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

sm565 please - restore my comment
hi there

I think even if you have a different view on Adams case it is appropriate to restore my original report. I think hidding other's people opinion is not according to the rules.

I will contact other admninistrators about that as well.

Let me know.Best wishes. --Sm565 22:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I had told him he was welcome to open an RFC as well. Daniel Case 03:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Guess what?
Don't say "guess what", please. It's rather sarcastic in tone and annoying. I didn't even add the statement you removed or care that you did, in fact I would've removed it myself. But please try to be a little more civil about it. It'll help people accept your edits rather than become inclined to war with you. Thanks. Equazcion • argue/improves • 17:53, 10/10/2007

Radiohead
Excessive? I really don't see how. Every music sample is below the proper 10% threshold and every image, fair use or not, is properly cited. In regards to my vandalism comment, I'm sorry, but it seemed that the extent of the deletions were simply that-vandalism. Atlantik (talk) 23:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

/joe francis
The Joe Francis page is continuously being edited with pieces about Francis' legal battles. Every time something else is added, even supporting, it is deleted. What stays is the negative. I figured I'd create a page just for his legal issues, allowing his main page to be a bio with references to the legal stuff, but not all about it. Jaydon Farrely 17:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Page Creation
Thank you. It is not necessarily my criticism, it is that from others. I will work on the page and than set it up as an article. Jaydon Farrely 17:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Kevin T. McCarthy Article
Hi I am currently creating a article for Kevin T. McCarthy an American film actor. I noticed during my editing it was deleted.

As stated:17:33, 12 October 2007 EliminatorJR (Talk | contribs) deleted "Kevin T. McCarthy" ‎ (db-bio: no assertion of notability: content was: '== Early life ==McCarthy was born and grew up in New Jersey to Mary Ann and Thomas. He is the middle of three sons. Acting Beginnings...' (and the only contributor was '[[Special:Contributions/)

Please see the following URL link: http://www.kevintmccarthy.com/ for authentication of Kevin T. McCarthy.

I am new to Wiki and am still learning the ropes.

Thank you.

Kevin T. McCarthy Article
So I guess for startes, how do I create a Kevin T. McCarthy Article with out it being deleted.
 * COI issues, methinks. -- But |seriously |folks  21:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: DST edit
Thanks Eliminator JR!

This is my first go at all this, so I only realized that after the fact...

Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duchess of newcastle (talk • contribs) 17:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

you're right
The pea-sized brain comment was out of line. I began a little more politely, but his ignorant, aggressive attitude (to be blunt) put me off. I'll try to be more patient in the future. Thanks for your help and advice. T i a <font color="#800000">m <font color="#B93B8F">u <font color="#800000">t  20:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I am not re
Notice: You are re-creating a page that was deleted.

You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. Information is available on what to do if a page you created is deleted. The deletion log for this page is provided here for convenience: 01:04, 14 October 2007 EliminatorJR (Talk | contribs) deleted "Dj icee" ‎ (CSD A7:content was: 'db-bioDJ Icee,(Born Luke Minklejn) often referred to as "DJ Icee Fresh".Born and raised in Poland, Elk on August, 3 1991.DJIcee ...')

Why was my page dealted about this person? he is a real person and its not DJ Icey its DJ Icee he is a DJ from year 2000 it is not a spam! what is goig on?

Reason for deleting Open Coffee?
Not sure why Open Coffee would be seen as spam. It is not a commercial organisation, indeed it is not an organisation at all but a idea for networking that is spreading by word of mouth. What's the problem?

Phoebe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebebright (talk • contribs) 09:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

List of British flags
I just seen your message on my talk page, I reverted Astrotrain simply because him and myself are involved in Mediation  on this issue, yet he decides to start edit warring again, as you see in the link I ask him not to do so. I have no intention of edit warring on this issue.--Padraig 21:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
It was a copy... I was in the process of editing it!! Just looking for the verifiable information.. Was going to strip out other content!

Cheers Asha23 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asha23 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/The Blackout! The Blackout! The Blackout!
Hello, could I please ask you to review your afd result of Articles for deletion/The Blackout! The Blackout! The Blackout!. You closed the debate with a "The result was Keep, but probably better is a Merge to band article (which needs heavy cleanup)" but I am unsure how you came to this conclusion. I am aware that afd is not a vote but consensus. However, of the five contributors to the debate, two were "delete", two were "keep" and one was "merge". The two delete contributions quoted WP policy and reasons to support their request for deletion. The two who proposed keeping didn't. One, the article creator, said: "How this band is non-notable is beyond me. How this album is non-notable is beyond me. And if info is hard to come by on the Internet, that absolutely cements the need for coverage on Wikipedia". This doesn't cite Wikipedia policy at all. And his final comments seem to support a deletion argument rather than a keep article (ie, the argument that WP should have an article because there's no other sources). The other keep proposer's argument was that the album was notable because the band was notable. I'm not entirely sure he is right about the band, but even if he was, I'm not sure that every album by a part-notable band would be notable simply because the band is. In any event this editor was concerned at the lack of sources for the article. The contributor who proposed merge did so by saying "I cannot see any strong reason for a separate page about this album". When all this is considered I conclude that the consensus of those who took part in the debate was "delete" because the arguments put forward by those who advocated this position outweighed those who advocated keeping. I'd be grateful if you could look again at your decision. Thank You. B1atv 07:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Block/unblock of Andyr2
FYI, I saw the same report on AIV and edit-conflicted with the bot removing it after your initial block. My comment was going to be, "The account that is now blocked was blocked for being a "sockpuppet or single-purpose account" after some disputed editing on instant runoff voting. The single mainspace contribution so far by account, which was created before the block, is a good edit in an unrelated field. I see no reason to block. Leaving here for other admins to comment." Don't know if this helps at all. Newyorkbrad 17:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Already unblocked - I looked again and saw exactly what you did.  E LIMINATOR JR  17:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This user is a sock of BenB4/Nrcprm2026, who has stated that it is his interpretation of WP:IAR that he should keep creating accounts in spite of his ban. I have also brought this up on WP:AE. - Crockspot 17:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, so this is a sock of a sock of a sock. I'll defer further investigation to EliminatorJR. Newyorkbrad 17:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

See the User:Nrcprm2026 sections here (older discussion), and here (current discussion). - Crockspot 17:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks - after looking at it, I've reblocked. The user can explain the situation at RFU if they wish to be unblocked.   E LIMINATOR  JR  17:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I've had that account watchlisted waiting for it to become active. I'm sure there will be more. - Crockspot 17:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Personal Computer article edit
I'm trying to add a few references to fulfill some citation request but the edit page says the article is 37 bytes long and refuses to save or preview. Is the article locked or is there another problem atm? I can edit other pages and my personal page so it's not a browser error. Alatari 14:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Frank Gaffney
Reintroduce? Find me the diff of me adding that category. Because last time I checked the only edit I made reintroducing that category was a reversion of vandalism. Your talkpage post is better directed at bogdan, the user who added the category in the first place. Perspicacite 21:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Cell Cel
Hi, regarding the notablility of Celly Cel. With a quick Google search there seems to be a number of reliable and notable websites who recognize him:
 * Celly Cel at VH1
 * Celly Cel at Yahoo
 * Celly Cel at Raphsody
 * Celly Cel at AOL

My initial opinion would be to say that he is notable enough to have an article on wikipedia. His albums also seem to be recognized and reviewed by notable sites such as All Music Guide. I am not, however, familiar with him and am sorry that I couldn't be anymore help. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   21:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Recent Deletion
Please can you explain why you deleted Usertalk:Microchip08/Archive!? I don't understand the policy. Thanks, microchip08 15:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC).
 * EDIT: Can I help with Veropedia? microchip08 15:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC).
 * Thankyou, resolved. microchip08 15:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC).
 * I will do. Thanks for your help! microchip08 15:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC).

JAMAA
I understand where you're coming from, and respect your opinion. I restored the page due to the fact that very few administrators have participated and shared their opinions in the deletion review (other than Metros, who indeed has a bias against me - He has literally "tracked my moves" and reverted them, often giving no justification or reason for his reverts). Hopefully, now that you've requested administrative review on my current version, this will start moving and will eventually get restored. The article obviously did not qualify for speedy deletion, but because of Metros' stalking of my edit history, he deleted it within minutes of its nomination for speedy deletion, without adding any discussion to the talk page or giving any warning to myself or others. This is absolutely an abuse of admin power, and not the first time Metros has shown such qualities. Rhythmnation2004 16:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Other admins have agreed at the deletion review that my deletion was valid. Another person agreed it was non-notable since he originally tagged it for speedy deletion.  And no one but you has questioned the deletion.  How this deletion is abusive boggles my mind.  Metros 16:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Janes Beale's Brother in EastEnders
I see you deleated the new page I created for Jane's brother in EastEnders. The source is in this weeks issue of Inside Soap. Its mentioned in an interview with Diederick Santar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammera (talk • contribs) 12:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Someone keeps spamming (RULES1&2) with the URL to edit your talk page. Do you hate Anonymous? —Preceding unsigned comment added by VoodooKobra (talk • contribs) 02:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

speedy
I remind you that fictional characters cannot be deleted by speedy--it is necessary to use WP:PROd, see WP:CSD.DGG (talk) 07:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * They were deleted in order to create a "List of ... characters" article; the content was not lost.  E LIMINATOR JR  12:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)