User talk:Black Santana

I'm a Beach, who edit on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.45.254 (talk) 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm Nasnema. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gucci Mane because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nasnema  Chat  15:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tha Thug Show with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 18:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=631675940 your edit] to Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at YG (rapper). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Rolling Papers (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Rolling Papers (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 16:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euro (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Kamaal/The Abstract, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 2 weeks from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Promise me that you will use the talk pages to get consensus before making more genre changes and I will unblock you now. Okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Gorilla Zoe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gorilla Zoe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

April 2015
Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hood Figga— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Keith Murray (rapper), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tiptoety talk 05:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Young Thug, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 12:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Young Thug. Final warning for repeatedly changing year of birth; all sources in the article clearly state year of birth as 1991, not 1992. Thomas.W talk 12:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chillin (Wale song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 20:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 20:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik. Dan56 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)