User talk:Black houk

Welcome!
Hello, Black houk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Go Phightins! (talk) 02:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Tariq Ziyad


A tag has been placed on Tariq Ziyad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Go Phightins! (talk) 02:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012, part 1
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Tariq Ziyad. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tariq Ziyad


A tag has been placed on Tariq Ziyad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mediran talk 00:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012, part 2
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2011–12 Manchester United F.C. season. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – HonorTheKing (talk) 03:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012, part 3
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Iraqi Air Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Seeker, Transfer, Fighters, C42, L-39, J-7 and JetStar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Boeing AH-64 Apache, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -Fnlayson (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Boeing CH-47 Chinook. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Fnlayson (talk) 06:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tariq Ziyad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tariq Ziyad


The article Tariq Ziyad has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GiantSnowman 11:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Manchester United F.C. because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tariq Ziyad


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tariq Ziyad, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tariq Ziyad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tariq Ziyad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tariq Ziyad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tariq Ziyad. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tariq Ziyad, you may be blocked from editing. ''There is no reference to support a transfer or that this person is even a footballer. I suggest you stop now.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manchester United F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure what part of reliable sources you're not clear on, but If this transfer to Man U were a reality, it would be in the papers and would be all over the Internet as well. Please stop this embarrassing charade. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Spencer T♦ C 05:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Real Madrid C.F., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * he is still keep vandalizing the Iraq national football team. here . Kindly do the right thing and stop this user permanently. Mussav (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Understood. He made those changes before he made the ones to Real Madrid which is why the only warning was issued. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Please stop adding false and/or misleading information to articles. You have been warned about this several times. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Iraqi Army
Most of the images you uploaded to Commons yesterday have been deleted because they were copyrighted. So please don't try to put them into a gallery in this article. Instead you should focus on finding reliable sources for the many items of equipment that are listed in the article. That would really be helpful. De728631 (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

And please don't be too quick with describing the images you found. E.g. File:An Iraqi crewmember.jpg is not at all a Chinook helicopter but according the original description by the US military, it is the interior of a C-130 Hercules airplane of the Iraqi Air Force. And this is not a Panhard AML either. De728631 (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at T-90‎, you may be blocked from editing. 'Note: This is not funny anymore. Now you had your fun and you've been blocked on several occasions for abusing you editing privileges so I'd strongly suggest that you knock it off before we BLOCK/BAN you permanently.' Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 18:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, most notably adding content to articles which at best is unsourc4ed, and in many cases is demonstrably false. You have received numerous warnings about your editing over the course of more than six months, and have twice been blocked for limited periods, but it is clear that you have no intention of changing your ways. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)