User talk:Blackable2323

Speedy deletion of "Fidel Nadal"
A page you created, Fidel Nadal, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. StaticGull Talk  17:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Flagging Fidel Nadal for further review
Hello, … I recently encountered the article about Fidel Nadal and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now — Triwbe (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Barbadian Brazilian
An article that you have been involved in editing, Barbadian Brazilian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Barbadian Brazilian. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jamaican Brazilian
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jamaican Brazilian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jamaican Brazilian. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tyler Craig (Comedian)
A tag has been placed on Tyler Craig (Comedian), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. justinfr (talk/contribs) 03:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Maxx Blacc"
A page you created, Maxx Blacc, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Razor ICE  12:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Pac biters
I have nominated pac biters for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Snigbrook 22:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet notice
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Suspected sock puppets/Troy86. Thank you. It has been proposed that your account should be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are not a sock, it is in your interest to respond. EdJohnston (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Julio Pinedo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Julio Pinedo.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Cordless Larry (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Blackable2323! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Julio Pinedo -

Proposed deletion of Julio Pinedo


The article Julio Pinedo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This poorly translated BLP has remained unsourced and incomprehensible for nearly two years, despite being tagged for wikification, notability, and sources since December 2008.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)