User talk:Blacknclick

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw was changed by Blacknclick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868682 on 2014-11-19T17:59:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Photos
Hi Blacknclick: As I said at the ClueBot talk page, I have reverted the bot at Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw and attempted to report it as a false positive. Note that the message above from the bot includes information on how to do this; the bot is very sophisticated but does sometimes make mistakes. I apologise that this happened to you, and am also sorry that you were reverted on another article without a reason being given.

I've looked at your uploads on Commons and they do look very high quality. I suspect the humans - as opposed to the bots - are finding them rather too good to be true, wondering how you come to have access to so many prominent people, within only a month, and are able to take such excellent photographs of them. If you were indeed the photographer, congratulations and we're delighted to have you aboard. However, I trust you realise that by uploading them to Commons, you are relinquishing all right to direct how they are reused by anyone? And if you are merely processing pictures where someone else actually operated the camera, you should amend the statements at Commons accordingly, and make sure the copyright owner (almost always the photographer, even if they were paid for their work) has given permission for unrestricted reuse. We have many users, usually new, who do not understand the point about ownership of an image, and it's made some of our vandal patrollers suspicious of image replacements. Again, I regret that, but I hope that possible reason makes it more understandable. I've left a template at the top of this page welcoming you and giving links to policies and information pages. Again, welcome and thanks! Yngvadottir (talk) 20:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Yngvadottir,

Thank you so much for the support and I am really happy about your comments about my photographs. Further, I am a good traveler and love to attend public functions to learn more social commitments. All the photographs I am uploading are under CC and I am well aware about the status of the photographs I am uploading. I am the owner and copyright holder and I have all the right to publish my photographs. I would love to upload more and more photographs to wiki and I will try to do as much as possible. Further, I am uploading photographs which has good EV and the other photographs will have artistic attraction are keeping with me. I understood the reason behind your question about the paid assignment, please don't bother about it, I am not clicking all these for somebody else.

Thank you so much for the support and keep supporting me to make a lot of valuable contributions to wiki.

Blacknclick (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Redundant photos
They're great photos, but you should follow WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE when deciding which articles to add them to. The Toothbrush article already had a photo of a similar-looking plain plastic brush in the lede, so did not need a second ("multiple images with very similar content is less useful" in the MOS) - since the existing photo had three different brushes in it, that seemed to be the one worth keeping. Your heavily-cropped photo of the Ear looked rather abstract, as if ears were detachable with little tabs on the side - a photo of an ear as it appears on the human head seems more useful to the reader ("images should look like what they are meant to illustrate").

Only my opinions, though, feel free to discuss both photos on the talk pages of the articles if you think there's a reason why they're appropriate. --McGeddon (talk) 06:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Would you please initiate a discussion in this for pages McGeddon ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacknclick (talk • contribs) 07:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think it is relevant to show the human ear in context, I don't see that anything is gained from removing that context. And like I say, if the options are (1) one high-quality image of a single brush (2) one good-quality image of three different brushes and (3) both of those images together, even though the brush in the first image is similar to the brush in the second, I'd go for option 2.
 * Per WP:ONUS, the person wanting the image included should really be the one to start the discussion - I wouldn't want to accidentally misrepresent your reasons for wanting the pictures included. --McGeddon (talk) 12:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * @McGeddon 2409:4050:2EC1:1C38:0:0:CD09:6F11 (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Cardinal Baselios Cleemis Cardinal Thottunkal.jpg scheduled for POTD
Hi Blacknclick,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Cardinal Baselios Cleemis Cardinal Thottunkal.jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 15, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-06-15. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Horse Gram BNC.jpg scheduled for POTD
Hi Blacknclick,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Horse Gram BNC.jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 15, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-09-15. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello Blacknclick. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Rocket Science (production company), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Blacknclick. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Hemiauchenia (talk) 08:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Upwork ad for same article, posted around July 16 2021. --- Possibly &#9742; 08:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --- Possibly &#9742; 08:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Rocket Science (production company) moved to draftspace
This article has been moved to draftspace for AFC review, per the guidelines in WP:COI and WP:DRAFTIFY. --- Possibly &#9742; 08:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammad Mahdi Karim. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - TheresNoTime 😺 09:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Not so; see Administrators' noticeboard Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rocket Science (production company)
Hello, Blacknclick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rocket Science (production company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rocket Science (production company)


Hello, Blacknclick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rocket Science".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)