User talk:Blackrock01

References needed
I advise you to add some references supporting the notability of the URENIO project, from third party reliable published sources outside your university and sponsors. Otherwise the articles is extre3meley likely to be deleted. 00:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

URENIO
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article URENIO, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of URENIO. Krakatoa Katie  07:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

It is not correct that "References are not about this group but are instead about the terms in the article". All the six references are about the group.

The issue of deleting this article was already discussed and resolved with previous WP editors: see, Shalom (20 August 2007); Evil Spartan (20 August 2007); Smackboat (20 August 2007); see also the first comment on this page(00:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC). This article has been proposed for deletion by Shalom (20 August 2007)and it was retained after its revision. The policy of Wikipedia is that "Articles that Have previously been proposed for deletion; Have previously been undeleted; Have been discussed on AfD or MfD; are not candidates for the prod template. It is not very productive to come again on the same issue.

Singular or plural ?
Dear Urenio,

since you are a major contributor the article Intelligent cities, i would like to ask you this question personally.

Isn't the singular a standard in Wikipedia ?

I mean, of course: shouldn't the article be named Intelligent city, instead of Intelligent cities ?

All the best, --Hgfernan (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Dear hgfernan,

As concepts, ‘intelligent city” and “intelligent cities” are the same. However, I would prefer the plural (intelligent cities) because it gives emphasis to the diversity that characterizes both the understanding and the appearance / development paths of such places. There is not one single – best solution.

With kind regards, NK, URENIO

File source problem with File:Intel cities platforms.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Intel cities platforms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Intel cities platforms.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Intel cities platforms.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello Urenio. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article URENIO, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Please change your username
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Urenio) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because represents the name of an organization, not you as an individual, which may result in this account being blocked. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

COI and username
Dear Amatulic, many thanks for the message on username. This username will not be used anymore. The material added on the page is descriptive. If you see a COI please let me know to change or remove the section. OTRS pending on the file: Intel cities platforms.jpg


 * I know you've been a constructive editor, that's why I chose to post some notifications to you rather than block you for violation of the username policy. Someone reported you on Usernames for administrator attention and that was my response.


 * The COI notice is standard for anyone who appears to be editing in behalf of their organization. You can't get blocked for a conflict of interest, but you should disclose it.


 * Please see Changing username for information about changing your name. I hope you do so, and continue your good work here. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Changing username
Thanks for the notification you posted. I placed a request for username change: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple

PS. Urenio is a surname also (see: http://www.surnameweb.org/Urenio/surname-origin.htm)


 * Of course it is. The issue is the coincidence between your username and your primary article of involvement having the same name, suggesting you may be editing in behalf of that organization rather than as an individual. Anyway, I'm glad you requested a change. 22:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)