User talk:Blaine666

AfD nomination of Hana Vitvarova
An editor has nominated Hana Vitvarova, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008: External links
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Brianhe (talk) 05:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Treaty of Tripoli
Blaine666, your contribution to this article, that "The English version of the treaty is what was ratified by Congress and thus has become the supreme law of the land (Article VI, Section II, United States Constitution)" is political polemic (which is inappropriate here), and is also factually incorrect. The "supreme law of the land" is the U.S. Constitution, itself, not any treaty. Please remember Sargeant Joe Friday's rule: "Just the facts!" (a/k/a WP:NPOV). NCdave (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

NCdave, it is factually correct. Please read article 6, clause 2 of the Constitution. Let me quote it since you are unfamiliar with it: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding". I don't know Joe Friday and you apparently don't know the constitution. Please also note that every judge in every state is bound by Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli. You might also find the Wiki entry for the 'Supremacy Clause' of value [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause]. Blaine666 (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)