User talk:Blainetologist/Archive1

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tupac Shakur, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Soulja Slim, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

If you would explain what you claim is "vandalism" that'd be good, because no "vandalism" happened. Blainetologist 15:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * This edit could easily be construed as vandalism, since you repeatedly inserted material obviously unsuited to an encyclopaedia article and is not in keeping with our requirement that the encyclopaedia be written from a neutral point of view. While the first insertion could be interpreted as a misunderstanding on your part as to what an encyclopaedia article should contain, your reinsertion of the material suggested that you were simply trying to insert junk into the article, in other words, vandalism (please have a look at our vandalism policy).  This edit is similarly unsuitable.  Guettarda 15:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Maybe you should also have a look at our policy on personal attacks. I see no harrassment here.  Please read the links I provided, familiarise yourself with policy.  Thanks.  Guettarda 15:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Already done, he's trying to harass me, nothing more. Blainetologist 15:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, I ask that you review those links. Personal attacks are not tolerated.  You aren't going to get very far here if you can't be civil.  Guettarda 15:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Already done, it's not a "personal attack" to point out when someone is harassing me and YOU KNOW IT. Stop making false statements. Blainetologist 16:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * When you finally get around to reading those links to policy, please also review our policy on civility. Guettarda 16:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Already done. Lying isn't civil so stop lying. Blainetologist 16:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * So are you are wilfully disregarding policy then? Guettarda 16:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

(after edit conflict)I had already suggested WP:CIVIL - he posted on my talk at the same time as here, please see the discussion at User_talk:KillerChihuahua. Edited to add: accusing someone of lying is a personal attack. This is your last warning before blocking. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Load of cow crap, that's nowhere in the policy. Blainetologist 16:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Pointing something out is not a personal attack. Calling people by insulting names is. Guettarda 16:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Which is a point hasn't been done and I'm tired of being threatened and harassed. Blainetologist 16:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * You are not free to include insults in edit summaries either. Guettarda 16:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I see you've already been warned about WP:NPA and you chose to ignore it, so you've been temporarily blocked for this edit summary: Use the time off to reconsider your manner of participation on the project and to become more familiar with the WP:RULES. FeloniousMonk 16:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * did nothing of the sort but your protecting your friends who harassed me I see. Blainetologist 16:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I do believe FeloniousMonk is an independant 3rd (actually 4th) party here, so consider apologising? Kim Bruning 17:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I just popped in here to warn you about this edit summary "(Revert edits by yappydog)", and find you arguing the point. Sorry, this is just not an acceptable level of civility. Please take the time off you've been given to think hard about the reading materials you've been asked to review. We take our policies seriously. Given the number of independent admins that have noticed your actions, it would be hard to make any sort of case that you're being "picked on".  + + Lar: t/c 17:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * We've already discussed that on irc. Hopefully it won't happen again :-) Kim Bruning 18:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Dissenting opinion
The WP:VAND policy specifically states that NPOV violations are not vandalism. Therefor it was inappropriate to use a vandalism template in response to this edit. Further, jumping directly to 'test3' with no prior warnings or explanation is also clearly inappropriate even if this had been vandalism.

Obviously Blainetologist needs to take a good look at our neutral point of view policy and his response to provocation certainly violated civility and personal attack standards, but some of that provocation was unjustified and thus a minor civility issue and a significant don't bite the newbies problem itself. We're supposed to be helping newcomers learn the ropes, not antagonizing them into becoming trolls. --CBDunkerson 13:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --CBDunkerson 13:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Unblocked after IRC discussion
I had a discussion on IRC with this user. He uses TOR, so it's not surprising that he got nailed as an EK sockpuppet, which he may or may not be. He claims he is not allowed to uninstall TOR.

He has promised to be on his best behavior, so I have unblocked him. However, if he continues to misbehave, other admins should feel free to re-block him. Raul654 16:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

from anonymous person
This is about Dawah page: do you know Arabic?> left by 209.213.194.7
 * Yes. Blainetologist 19:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Your comment in the Blu Aardvark arbitration
Thanks for your comment. I have moved it to Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Blu_Aardvark.

You may make further comments there, or anywhere else on the arbitration except Requests_for_arbitration/Blu_Aardvark/Proposed decision, which is reserved mainly for arbitrators.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 17:30, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Civility
Regarding comments such as this: It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. --InShaneee 15:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)