User talk:Blake/Archive 2

ohi
i had no idea you were on wikipedia, blake! (it's may.) anything i can help with? :) talking  birds  21:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Pokémon
First of all, I have read WP:REDIRECT.

My editing is not about pointing directly to the article, per se, but fixing the spelling for "the Dragon Ball character," according to Wikipedia spelling standards that can apply to anime characters names. I will end my comment here seeing that I have to go now. —Tokek (talk) 00:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

It did not occur to me that one would perceive Frieza and Furiizaa as not alike in spelling. I understand now why you would want to make an exception to standard spelling policies: because Furiizaa better illustrates what you want. I think that reason would be just as applicable whether or not Furiizaa was a redirect. —Tokek (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Blastoise and Pokebox
Thanks for the note on my talk page! You might be interested in other pokemon templates I've created, pokebox (for more easily filling out infobox VG character) and pokeconvert (name/number conversions). I'm not sure about joining a taskforce though as my contributions to pokemon articles waxes and wanes considerably. We'll see what the project does with this new article, if I have to fight them too much, when I've gone and found exactly what people leik AMIB have been wanting, I probably will not bother anymore (unless attitudes change). But i appreciate your comments and invitation. Happy editing -&#65279;ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 01:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:IRC
heh. I would, but I don't have control over the bot. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 02:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Apology & remaining concern
You are right; I was mistaken. You undertook a short discussion on the subject. Try Talk:Fascism or Talk:Sarah Palin if you laboring under the mistaken impression that the discussion on Blastoise is a thorough discussion. The former especially is a good example of how to categorize a compromise wording; unfortunately it seems that the Blastoise discussion is bogged down over the much more basic aesthetic of notability, and subverted by AfD and reverts; looking at the pros isn't going to help much if the basics aren't mastered. Anarchangel (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

merging blastoise into list
I wanted to point out that when you copy/pasted the info, you forgot to include the cooper ref from the article which is used to source things like moves and strategy, without a reference it could be taken as specualation. --&#65279;ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 14:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Responding to Mario Comment
If nicknames are not important than why are you caring so much about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red (talk • contribs) 18:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Responding to Mario Comment
Blake, it is only 5 words and you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. If you don't want to start a debate war, then i'd suggest you'd stop arguing about this mere little thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red (talk • contribs) 19:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Charizard
Nice work rebuilding the Charizard article. It looks pretty good. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I built it up from this, so I had a pretty good head start. Also, the editors at WP:POKE help alot. --Blake (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

ANI
I'm giving you a courtesy notice that I have reported the above user to ANI per the personal attacks/incivility made. See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Regards, MuZemike 02:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Starter Pokemon
Hm, not really what I had in mind with the article to be honest. What I was thinking more was taking what development information we did have to them and the reaction to the Grass/Water/Fire lineup at the start of every game and building the article around that. It could also illustrate that guides pointed out such as the case of the RGB one I have that the starter pokemon effectively set the starting "difficulty" in the game, mainly in the aforementioned titles. What do you think?

By the way sorry I haven't lent a hand that much with the article stuff, arguing with Zapper and working on my game's kinda got me tied up. :\--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Lucario movie
Don't tell anyone, but if Lucario isn't notable, neither is his movie! It has less references than Lucario, and they are from less realiable sources. All I can find for Lucario/influence is newspaper reviews in the New York Times of his movie. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

All this crap reminds me
Wow, thanks! On this note, diddnt we have a Pokémon barnstar? It got lost somwhere. It was Pokéball themed. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it got removed because of fair-use issues (same reason the Nintendo taskforce uses the mushroom icon it does now :S)--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:9blastoise.png)
Thanks for uploading File:9blastoise.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:TrainerGold.png)
 Thanks for uploading File:TrainerGold.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Re
Don't worry, I know quite a bit about Pokemon and plan on being actve in the project. :) Mokoniki | talk 11:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Pokémon/Torchic
WikiProject Pokémon/Torchic, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Torchic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Pokémon/Torchic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Mudkip
Might be a good idea to move it to your workspace or to outright delete it instead. Without the meme backing it up (which apparently was never actually about Mudkip to begin with if I read all that mess right x.X) I don't see it ever having enough to be an article at this point Blake.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)