User talk:Blake24

Greetings...
Hello, Blake24, and welcome to Wikipedia!
 * To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".
 * I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!
 * Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

German Peruvian
Hello. You removed a link that provided the associated data here, but you did not provide a link that was the source of the data you changed. Please note that adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Elockid (talk) 01:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to German Peruvian. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio López (desu) 04:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Peru, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 20:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Peru, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 06:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Peru. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Aug 2011
You and Victor12 are getting this same warning:

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring on Peru. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Peru ‎. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Peru. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Materialscientist (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2011
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Socking (CU confirmed) and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 01:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Peru ‎. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Edit-warring
Please respond to the report at WP:ANEW. If you fail to discuss your changes either there or on the article talk page but continue to revert, you may be blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=576403781 your edit] to Croatian Peruvian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * | poptime = c. 82,000