User talk:BlakeCS

-mab pages
I see you have created a number of pages regarding -mab suffixes. I have tagged these pages as requiring improved context. Please try to improve the introductions to these pages:
 * -amab
 * -axomab
 * -emab
 * -imab
 * -omab
 * -umab
 * -ximab
 * -zumab

Thanks, — Swpb talk contribs 03:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

No harm intended, I just have no idea what the articles are about from looking at them. I had to dig through three layers to figure out that it had something to do with a term for an antibody. Have you considered merging them together and redirecting so that each one isn't extremely short? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

On your userpage, you wrote "Note to users: Please do not delete my created articles." May I direct you to the policy Ownership of articles, which explains that articles on Wikipedia belong to the entire community. If you create articles that do not meet the criteria for articles, they will be deleted or merged, and as the creator of the article, you have no special rights. — Swpb talk contribs 21:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it only fair to say that if you continue to create these articles, which have almost zero content, they run a very high risk of all being deleted. Havce you considered fleshing them out, one at a time, before proceeding to the next one? At present they contain little more than the medication name, and incidentally each one contains the same grammatical error (it's).--Anthony.bradbury 22:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I say again, given that these articles as they stand are wholly pointless, being nothing more than a cataloigue of the names of monoclonal antibodies, do you intend to flesh them out? Or shall I mark trhem all for deletion? Talk to me.--Anthony.bradbury 23:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I do flesh them out before I proceed to the next one, only one at a time. --BlakeCS 11:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Please read this before continuing
No. Read this before you decide to do so. Thanks. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 22:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason why you have all of those subpages on your userpage about hexspeak? I reverted one after thinking you had created more again. Are you using these as a template or are you going to just leave them there? :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 15:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * All of them deleted, per this debate. &gt;Radi a n t &lt;  12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

User page
I see that you have the names of several people listed on your user page. This may be a possible invasion of their privacy. Could you please remove them. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed them myself. Yuser31415 21:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Admin userbox
Hi. Please don't falsely claim to be an administrator by adding the "admin" userbox; doing so is frowned on and repeated continuation of such behavior tends to result in a block. Yuser31415 22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that. I would have removed it and the names if I'd seen it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

How do I supposed to be an administrator? --BlakeCS 23:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Your purpose?
Can you explain why you tried to delete another user's userpage? | Mr. Darcy talk 02:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:0xdeadbeef.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0xdeadbeef.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Monoclonal antibodies
Hi there; if you really intend to produce an array of stub articles on monoclonal antibodies, all with essentially no content, is it too much to ask that in the initial declarative sentence you could get the grammar right?--Anthony.bradbury 22:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I do. --BlakeCS 05:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

usernameblocked
Umm, I dont think its necessary to tag all these usernames as a) they were created months and months ago and b) we dont really need F@#K WIKIPEDIA showing up in search engines (after you've created the page that is)

Thanks Glen 05:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
I think my visilizumab article seems to be vandalized. I reverted it myself. --BlakeCS 12:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a message to a vandal. --BlakeCS 12:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion tags on User:Ocobot subpages
You marked discussion pages of subpages of my bot for speedy deletion, because they redirected to the not yet existing discussion page of the bot. While this might conform with the rules, it doesn't make much sense. I rely on Ignore_all_rules here. I think it's useful to collect all comments about a bot at its account's main discussion page, even — or especially — when no comments have been made yet. — Ocolon 23:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Request for administratorship
BlakeCS, please don't ask other administrators to grant you those rights for several reasons:
 * Only Bureaucrats can technically assign those rights in the system.
 * You need to be nominated for Requests for adminship and be supported by a majority of experienced editors and other administrators who will review your application and scrutinize your responses to their questions.
 * With only 646 edits over 3 months to your account (your edit count), you are too inexperienced and are unlikely to be familiar with our Policies and guidelines. Don't expect anyone to support your nomination unless you have around 4000-5000 edits over 6-9 months.

If you're still keen on becoming an administrator, your first steps will be to read through Guide to requests for adminship and also take a look at some past nominations so you can see what we're looking for. Thanks. --  Netsnipe   ►  02:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4000 is a bit too high. If you can justify lower numbers 1500-2000, by making more quality edits, you can also be an admin. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Right. I will make some quality edits. --BlakeCS 13:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hi! I have closed your RFA early as the community feels that you need to spend more time on wikipedia before applying for adminship. Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I told you so, but you didn't listen. Just curious, but how old are you? You'll probably have to wait a few months longer than 6-9 before reapplying because other administrators may now perceive that you're too impatient and rash to be an administrator. --  Netsnipe  ►  17:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Please explain
Can you explain this edit? Is that account a sockpuppet of yours (or, more accurately, is this account a sockpuppet of that account?) Why place an unblock request after all that time has passed and you have this account? Kafziel Talk 14:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion
 A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page. VegaDark (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

List of Irish surnames starting with I
Hi there. Just wondering, as you created this list... how/why you think Irons should be on it? Our family understands it as an anglisized version of Aarons, as in "Son of Aaron".Garrie 04:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Monoclonal antibody stubs - not notables ?
A large number of articles yoiu created do not seem to be notable - see discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pharmacology - this is heading to a group proposal for AfD. David Ruben Talk 15:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Given the results of Articles for deletion/Ananeuzumab, I have blocked this account. To be unblocked you should give an explanation for the large series of hoax-ish antibody articles you created...If you wish to be unblocked, please provide an explanation here.

I have also blocked, apparently an alternate account of this one. &mdash; Scientizzle 05:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

AfD nomination of List of Irish surnames starting with A
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Irish surnames starting with A, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 05:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Beware of the tigers
A tag has been placed on Template:Beware of the tigers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Biciromab brallobarbital
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Biciromab brallobarbital. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Biciromab brallobarbital. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Redirtypo-warn
Template:Redirtypo-warn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)