User talk:Blakebridges08/Annie Burton/Johnnysnow2106 Peer Review

Peer Review
The article does a good job organizing information in a neutral tone. The article does well with giving an overview of each article within the constitution. The article could continue to update information in the The Impact Today section. This would help the reader understand how history connects to present day. In light of thinking about ideas I could adopt, I think summarizing the articles of the constitution was an idea. I could add a summary section to my article, because it doesn’t have one. Also, the lead section was brief and concise, had clear structure, reliable sources, and neutral language. I feel the lead gives a good overview of the founding members of the AASS. The lead doesn’t seem to overshadow any points other the other, and that gives the editors room to organize the article as needed. The transition between article is also clear, well organized, and well balanced. Johnnysnow2106 (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)