User talk:BlancaOsuna


 * Spam tracking

February 2019
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  MrOllie (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

You are right. That's my mistake. Just I would like to fix that permanent dead link. Hope, it is necessary and appropriate. Thanks

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

I see that you have continued with the same editing about which you have been warned. If it had simply been a matter of one more attempt to post a spam link to your wiki (which, incidentally, also appears to infringe copyright), I would for now have just given you a warning that if you did it again you would be blocked from editing, but it has become more than that. You have attempted to get me to edit on your behalf, evidently in an attempt to avoid being seen to continue doing what you have been warned about. You have also, without any explanation, reverted a good-faith and constructive edit by another editor made with the intention of serving exactly the purpose which you claimed to want. The combination of those various facts is enough to make it clear that you are not interested in constructive editing, so I have blocked your account from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with appropriate text. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

One more point which I forgot to mention. I shall periodically check for further spam links to your wiki. If any appear, I shall (1) remove them (2) ask for your web site to be added to the spam blacklist, so that nobody can ever post any links to it anywhere on Wikipedia, and (b) block whatever accounts or IP addresses posted the spam links. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

OK. I honor your decision. It will help to learn me. THANKS JBW

Attention Please: JBW 1.First to be clear one point that is, I had tried to get an admin's opinion (that’s why I didn’t make any change) Because, I know that previously I was wrong, did major mistakes. 2.So this time I was not confirmed that this editing should be right or wrong. ''Honestly speaking, my intention was not seeking Admin proxy editing! Never.'' 3.Secondly, about the word of “teach” and “learn”! Sir! You born on English, Grown up on English and living to, BUT Most of the parts of the World are not same, You know, Hope You understand. 4.Finally main reason of my talking, You Judged that “further trying to add links of my wiki, My web site to be added to the spam blacklist”. I honored your Judgment and didn’t do that. But here is a new edit which has been added to the spam blacklist. This new Judgment comes without breaking your condition. 5.Sir, don’t think that I’m seeking proxy editing rather then I’m seeking save myself as well as last opportunity to improve me. Well, Thanks JBW