User talk:Blaqdavinci

Notability of Flying Machine Arts
A tag has been placed on Flying Machine Arts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. thadius856talk 17:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Blaqdavinci
The article you created at Blaqdavinci was listed for deletion as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. &mdash;tregoweth (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Notability of and personal content in Blaqdavinci
A tag has been placed on Blaqdavinci, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, apparently the article's author, or a group of people, band, or club, which the author is a member of, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

Please do not place personal content in the article namespace. Unless it is notable, it will be speedily deleted. Pesonal information should only be put on your userpage

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atomic1609 17:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Blaqdavinci
Your user page is being considered for deletion on Miscellany for Deletion per WP:NOT. Atomic1609 19:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

While the decision was to keep the page, you should familiarize yourself with the guidelines for user pages. In particular, biographical information should be brief, and generally not written in the style of an encyclopedic article. —Doug Bell talk 06:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Copeland Bryan
Please remember that additions to articles need to be verifiable. This means I have to be able to find the info you add in a printed source like a book or newspaper or on a website. Unfortunately, vandals claim they know people personally too, so there's no way for us to know if they're really correct. If you have sources to back up the info you added, please mention them at the bottom of the article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)