User talk:BlasphemyGG

Speedy deletion nomination of Cherry Credits
Hello BlasphemyGG,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cherry Credits for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —ШαмıQ ✍ @ 16:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion
Hello, once again. No need to contest deletion when it has already been deleted. All you can do now is create the article here (i.e. in your own userspace). No one will delete it there. Ping me when you get your article ready there. —ШαмıQ ✍ @ 08:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, now you can expand it as much as you like; when you think it can survive the deletion process (it has sufficient references, is neutral, etc.) move it to the mainspace. Happy editing! —ШαмıQ ✍ @ 09:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Cherry Credits for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cherry Credits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cherry Credits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 21:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)