User talk:Blaspie55

Welcome!

Hello, ShotmanMaslo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Flibe Energy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Flibe Energy


A tag has been placed on Flibe Energy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Small modular reactor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PWR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

MS
Unable to find an English source to support this. Cheers -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

1.5 Fluid
Need some cited references here. MegaHasher (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Undid one of your edits
I just wanted to let you know that I undid your edit here, because the templates that you called don't seem to exist. What were you trying to do? I am curious, as your edit summary was "new stable version nomination", and I had been trying to promote the stable version template recently. Regards, Falconus p t   c 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Energy density
Hi ShotmanMaslo, I'm new, not a native speaker and translating the LTFR Wiki article to Polish. New also to Wiki. Please tell if I should better use "talk" at the article page or may I ask questions to someone like you? I'd appreciate every advice.

Well, since I am here already see my question:

I find "energy density" term in the "Economy and efficiency" section. It reads "The energy density is millions of times higher than any fossil fuel..." In my opinion such strong claim deserves a link to the Wiki Energy density article. Sadly thorium has only a minor remark there. Try to look also at the Polish version of the article and you will see that more detailed information appears in the table here (I added short English translation)

Fuzja deuter-tryt (fusion)	        337 000 000

Rozszczepienie uranu (100% U-235) (U fission)                              88 250 000 	1 500 000 000 (MJ/L)

Naturalny uran (99,3% U-238, 0,7% U-235) w reaktorze powielającym (fast breeding)  24 000 000

Uran wzbogacony (3,5% U-235) w reaktorze jądrowym (Enriched U in reactor fission)  3 456 000

Naturalny uran (0,7% U-235) w reaktorze jądrowym (natural U in ractor fission)      443 000

It makes good comparison I think. But thorium is absent here as well.

Would you share my opinion that thorium entry should be added to both articles? What are the corresponding MJ per kilogram and MJ per litre values?

Regards Maciek 77.252.246.129 (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.252.246.129 (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Indented lineHi.

You can use the article talk page I think. If you find a good reference for thorium energy density, then it should be added, also into the english LFTR article. I have not found specific figures, but it would probably be comparable to U-238 in fast breeder reactors (24 000 000 MJ/L).

Hey Shotman
Hi, you undid one of my edits on statistical research on a page, I respectfully disagree, the policy exchange the think tank that conducted the research has purposely set out to get a certain set of results, the institute is known to be against multiculturalism and in the past was exposed in england as forging documents for their research.

Read up on how they have been exposed in the past through forensic evidence.

"Michael Apple recently warned that “at a time when private think tanks seek to advance their ideological agenda through what is often shoddy research … (it is important to be reminded) … of the dangers of the misuse of data in significant educational policy debates” (2010, p. 1). Within the United States think tank reports are commonly attaining high visibility and impact despite their poor academic rigour (Welner, 2011). The example outlined in this paper shows how this experience may be occurring in Australia."

[www.aare.edu.au/11pap/papers_pdf/aarefinal00498.pdf]

Read up on the misuse of statistics by think tanks in the pdf.

It is my humble request that you revert the edit.

Cool name by the way.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Galaxy bias concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Galaxy bias, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Galaxy bias


Hello ShotmanMaslo. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Galaxy bias.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Psychedelic microdosing
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00692?rand=ibh46xln and https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324609.php, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bacopa monnieri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Your edit was not a review but preliminary research; see WP:MEDSCI. Also, you used an unreliable quackery journal from alternative medicine, which publishes nonsense. Do not use that type of source; review WP:MEDRS.'' Zefr (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Curcumin you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence (your addition has since been removed). When copying licensed material, you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. This can be done using the template. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010s in science and technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Go. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Kessler syndrome has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. - wolf  20:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Added note
There are multiple issues here; 1) you didn't indicate in your summary that the content you added was supported by the ref that was already there, giving the appearance of an WP:OR edit. 2) the ref doesn't support your addition. SpaceX set the altitude at 550km for "latency issues", not for collision avoidance, that was just a happy coincidence. 3) You were reverted, you should've posted your explanation to the talk page, instead of reverting again. That is because if there is an issue, (and there is), it doesn't lead to further reverts. Edit summaries are not a discussion venue. 4) All of this just leads to a waste of people's time. Instead of reverting you again, I'll give you an opportunity to correct your edit. - wolf  20:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on L-function
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page L-function, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Blaspie55&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1169215314 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L-function&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1169215314%7CL-function%5D%5D Ask for help])