User talk:Blastoise is my homie

Apology

Dear Wikipedians and Admins. I am sorry. I created "Golduck is my homie", but I am not "Incorrigible Troll". Rather, for some reason, I wanted to see how Wikipedia would react. And I now know that Wikipedia must rely on assumption and I now doubt whether any of the other "sockpuppets" are really sockpuppets or mere imposters. I will admit that I have had a not so good aditude at Wikipedia. When I first discovered it, I was quite new to the internet and only later knew that I could edit Wikipedia. At first, I was uncontroversal. Though I did not always edit in line with policy. And I have not always known many things. And I did get into fights with older Wikipedians. And I will admit that I have sometimes created Vandlaism only accounts. It all started one night when I lived in a diffent area. I created an account and did some disruptive editing. And I did create afcounts to get back at editors I was mad with. And finally, I did impersonate another vandal beside the one I did earlier. I am hoping to turn over a new leaf in my life. I might someday take a clean start for Wikipedia, though I do not know if I will. Maybe if I am able I will revert vandlaisms.

Last of all, even if you do not belive me, I speak the truth. I am not Incorrigible Troll. I do not even know him or her. As I said, I only made that imposter sock partly as a test. And I now understand that Wikipedoa can make mistakes by relying only on IPs and edit patturns. And who knows if many "socks" of other disruptive editors are mere imposters. You may block this account. But,again, do not tag it, as it is not what it may seem to be.

Sincerly, Anonymous user.

Ps Again, I am remorseful and want to turn over a new leaf. I feel like I have ruined myself by disrupting, vandlaisng, and impersonating, the last being the worst for me. Can I ever return wihout revealig my identity? I am ashamed. I do not wnat tonbreak any more policies. And to the real Incorrigible troll, even if I do not know him or her personally, he she ought to find aomehing better to do in life rather than disrupt a useful online resource. And, even if this is off, I do like pokemon too, not for any violence or supernatuarlism but for the positive themes of friendship as well as training for self defense.

Calm down
I can try and get you blocked if you really want to. But thanks for at least reverting one bad edit as you did to Soul Eater. Why not do something constructive here instead. You could take down all that nonsense from your talk and user pages, for a start. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. But I really want to do better in real life and here. If I choose to return maybe I will rename this account. But I do think I miht spend the rest of my days as an Ip doing what good I can. Regardless, I hope to do better. Do well with your time. Blastoise is my homie (talk) 02:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Real life is more important than online stuff - so you take care, my friend. Sad thing is, a lot of people really care about making this place the world's greatest free encyclopaedia. And even my two daughters use it all the time for school homework and projects.  So it can be really upsetting when it gets messed with. Some past trolls have made amends,  apologised for past behaviour, and gone on to become good, grown-up editors. Maybe you can too. Cheers. Nick Moyes (talk) 02:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)