User talk:Blaylockjam10

Welcome!
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SatuSuro 10:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  Siawase (talk) 10:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Eric Clapton, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Ramaksoud2000. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shambat (city) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587355320 your edit] to Military light utility vehicle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The importance of this class of military vehicle was summed up by General Dwight Eisenhower who said that the four most important US weapons in World War II were the C-47 Skytrain,

Hipster edit
Sorry about that, misread your edit as changing the text of the quote rather than just the piped links. --McGeddon (talk) 09:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Daisy Ridley
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

AWOL
Actually, both AWOL and A.W.O.L. redirect to Desertion. Pdfpdf (talk) 23:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Either that just changed or something screwed up somehow. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 00:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Valfontis (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Harold J. Greene
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

ISIS
Just to let you know, I moved your new sentence in the Lead to the section "As Islamic State" as a better place for it, to keep the Lead as brief as possible and because "As Islamic State" summarises main events since ISIS became IS. The supporting footnote is a bare URL; could you convert it to the standard WP format using one of the templates on the edit page, please? --P123ct1 (talk) 07:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. A couple of points.  Could you do the date and names in the same format as the other footnotes in "References" in future, please?  They have the author's surname first and the first name last.  Your template may just have "author". Mine and other's have a box for surname and a box for first name and a + sign for second and third names.  Can you let me know what yours has?  I think it may be an old template (don't ask me how you get it!) and if so, I'll get the technical people to sort it out so that everyone gets the same one from the drop-down menu. Sounds like a small point, but I am forever correcting footnote formats! --P123ct1 (talk) 12:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Americans
I strongly believe what you said. In response I replaced Robin Williams with Daniel Inouye. What do you think? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to join MILHIST
 Hello,, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 09:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ancient Mesopotamian religion
 * added a link pointing to Kingdom


 * Turbot War
 * added a link pointing to G-7

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkana Boy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Respiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammed Basindawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanaa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satavahana dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coinage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panic of 1792, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Supervolcano
Hi Blaylockjam10. I'm Siyu Lai. A student from China. I saw you modify a lot on "Supervolcano", and I have a few comments. In Newhall's Volcanic explosivity index, there are no VEI-9, and MAX VEI is 8. Even VEI-9 exist, I don't think any volcanoes could be describe as VEI-9. Have you read the paper which written by Newhall and Self(dol: 10.1029/JC087iC02p01231)? Their max VEI is 8. OK, this not the point. My point is the definition of measurement of VEI, which is the volume. You defined the measurement of VEI is to use dense rock equivalent, but I think that measurement of VEI is to use bulk volume. For many examples, 1991 eruption of Pinatubo defined as VEI-6, but the DRE of Pinatubo eruption products are only 4.8-6km3(Wiesner et al. 2004); 0.64 Ma eruption of Yellowstone(Lava Creek tuff) defined as VEI-8, but the bulk volume of Lava Creek tuff is only 1000km3(DRE could be much lower)(by Christiansen); 1815 eruption of Tambora defined as VEI-7, but the DRE of Tambora eruption products are only 41km3(Kandlbauer and Sparks., 2014). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyu Lai (talk • contribs) 04:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I was only doing maintenance edits & adding info from related supervolcano articles. I'm not an expert on supervolcanoes. I didn't do any definitions of how the VEI scale is measured & don't even know how the VEI scale is measured. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Desert Southwest


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Desert Southwest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS 4444 Talk  08:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Linden-Limmer) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Linden-Limmer, Blaylockjam10!

Wikipedia editor WikiEditCrunch just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article is too short.Please add some more content."

To reply, leave a comment on WikiEditCrunch's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Professional soldier listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Professional soldier. Since you had some involvement with the Professional soldier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. RekishiEJ (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to 1303 Crete earthquake does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 14:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Rabbani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic education. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

RfC Notice
There is a Request for Comment posted at Talk:New York Daily News. You are being notified as one of every registered editor who has edited that article in that past year. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Content forking listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Content forking. Since you had some involvement with the Content forking redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newman, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Valley ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Newman%2C_California check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Newman%2C_California?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi Blaylockjam10; could you please take a look at WP:OVERLINK? A link to the United States article really isn't needed at 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  03:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Air transat 236
The pilots were not at fault. There was a leak in fuel that they didnt know about Emojibop (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

There was no pilot error Emojibop (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you
...for your edits to the Samuel Little article. I was in the process of checking a sentence after finding the adjective "no-good" used, thinking it should moved into a quote or otherwise changed. After not finding the material in that source, I returned to do a redactive edit only to find you had preceded me with your edit. Thank you for your attention to the accuracy of this article to its sources. See also comment at the article page. 2601:246:C700:2DB2:9C90:D6E2:6F44:E4AB (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Be careful when splitting paragraphs please
If you split a a referenced paragraph and don't copy the citation like you did here we get confused people tagging previously referenced content as uncited. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Citizenship Amendment Act does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

HMS Duchess corrections
You need to add a cite for Jones' numbers. And why should his be preferred over the other sources?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

"Insider attack" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Insider attack and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

ITN nomination for 2022 Haitian crisis
Hey there! I've started a second discussion on the eligibility of the 2022 Haitian crisis article for ITN, and since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to provide your input. Thank you! — Matthew  - (talk) 22:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit Summary
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Happy editing and thank you for working on developing Wikipedia! Jo Jc Jo Talk💬Edits📝 21:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

CT alert for the BLP topic area
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 00:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

RD: Michel Côté & Victor Galeone
Hi, Blaylockjam10. Sorry that I was not around to respond to your pings at the end of the eligibility of these RD noms. RL got in the way. Thank you for your improvements to those articles. --PFHLai (talk) 22:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

No edit summary for edits at Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam
Hi Blaylockjam10, I noticed you didn't leave edit summaries for substantial edits at Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam. Due to the large number of edits there, it's really helpful if everyone leaves edit summaries. Would be great if you could do that in the future. Thanks! AncientWalrus (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Fakhri Khorvash
cc:user:Muboshgu

Greek snap election
Sorry, this disappeared off the nomination page before I read your message.  Schwede 66  06:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Clarence Barlow
Thank you for your additions to Clarence Barlow. Do we have a source of his day of birth, and his place of death? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Classical Music Daily is the source for both of those. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I looked for something new, - sorry, that was silly of me ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2865 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

David L. Mills
Hi there, I see the sentence that you are mentioning - I had read it in the context of the previous sentence. I'm reasonably sure the claim is incorrect, or at best misleading - here are two reasons:

1) I have a copy of "Computer Network Time Synchronisation - The Network Time Protocol" by Mills himself. In his bio inside the book it says: "Dr. David L. Mills is a professor of electrical and computer engineering and professor of computer and information sciences at the University of Dela-ware. He has been an active contributor for many years to Internet technology and in particular computer network time synchronization. He is the original developer of the Network Time Protocol and has authored more than 30 papers and technical reports on the subject, including the current operative standards documents. His Ph.D. degree in computer science was conferred by the University of Michigan in 1971. He is a member of the Association for Computer Machinery and the Institute of Electrical Engineering and is a Fellow of both societies." If he had been the creator of IPv4, this certainly would have mentioned it - it does mention that he was a contributor, but doesn't say "creator".

2) The draft standard for the Internet Protocol from 1978 mentioned is almost certainly IEN 41, which is available here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/ien41.pdf - while many people are involved with the process, he is not mentioned as one of the main contributors, and his work is not cited at the end. He was certainly involved, via his work on the Fuzzball routers - if you scroll through the end of the presentation here, you can see how the Fuzzballs relate to the 1978 work (in Mills's own words). https://web.archive.org/web/20170202190237/http://nsfnet-legacy.org/archives/02--Beginnings.pdf - his work on the Fuzzballs is already mentioned in the article.

David Malone (talk) 12:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * It may be best to say that Mills contributed to the creation of IPv4. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 07:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

February music
Thank you for your constructive ITN work! - I thanked Seiji Ozawa, and - as you know - have the story of Helga Paris today, a photographer of houses and faces. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for more help there! - The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Blaylockjam10! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

DYK nomination of Georgi Romanov
Hello! Your submission of Georgi Romanov at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

NFL 100th Anniversary All-Time Team
Hello. I know it's been over 4 years since you made the changes, but I wanted to make you aware of to NFL 100th Anniversary All-Time Team. You added that Gino Marchetti and Joe Schmidt were league MVPs, which they never were. I've removed this. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)