User talk:Blaze The Movie Fan/Archive Feb 2008

On this...
In that case, why don't you archive it manually? I only archive my talk page when it exceeds 65 535 bytes in size. Better still, how about looking at the talk page of this guy? I don't think he archives his talk page. -- Altiris   Helios   Exeunt  02:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Cleaner
Thanks for the suggestion, but I know about the two different films. Code Name was not that interesting, and completely different that the upcoming Samuel Jackson Cleaner. I'll just have to keep an eye open for the film. Thanks again for the help. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Helicopter
Copyedit from my talk page: "Just curious, when you cleaned up in your recent edits, did you add anything new? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)."
 * Not at all, this article was in "my watchlist" from awhile back when another editor had asked me to look at variances in reference formats. That is my entire interest in this article, i.e. doing a favour for another editor wherein I will periodically review the use of citations and references and other sundry formatting issues. Thanks for writing. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC).

Not Homer Simpson, actually.
That was in an episode of Family Guy, as a matter of fact. It was that one where those burglars kidnap Meg; perhaps you've seen it. It is true, though, the user was mistaken when they said it connects to Peter's middle name being of German origin; Hitler was Austrian, after all. But no, they didn't mean Homer Simpson when they put that in. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!


A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Why...

 * Yes, unless it's an archive, or it says it's been closed.  ClanCC  ( T |undefined /  C ) 09:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Redirect deletion request
Please note the outcome of your request at Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 13 - you have some redirects to edit. :-) -- ChrisO (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hehe, priceless edit summary :) Qst (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: 2007
OK, lemme think... I haven't had a chance to see some films, though, because I may have missed them in theaters and am still waiting on the DVD. I haven't seen most of the films there were nominated for the Oscars tonight. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 06:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ratatouille - Animated
 * The Bourne Ultimatum - Action
 * The Simpsons Movie - Comedy
 * Zodiac - Drama
 * Knocked Up - Comedy
 * Live Free or Die Hard - Action
 * Eastern Promises - Drama
 * American Gangster - Drama
 * The Orphanage - Horror
 * Oh, and The Lookout! Very overlooked film.  As for the worst movie, not sure, as I usually avoid movies that look bad.  I would have to say that Spider-Man 3 was pretty bad, honestly... maybe I had a lot of hope for it because of how awesome Spider-Man 2 was, but SM3 had a lot of things wrong with it. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 06:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I watched the show, too. Kind of wish they sped it up a little more.  I purposely skipped Rush Hour 3 and I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry because I didn't get the impression that I would like these at all.  I enjoyed Transformers to a point, but I don't consider it a favorite at all.  I thought that At World's End had a little too much going on with not much of a payoff.  Saw IV, eh... I'm kind of tired of torture porn like that.  That's why I liked The Orphanage a lot -- definitely a great horror film.  I saw The Kingdom, but I wasn't crazy about the subtle anti-Middle East jabs.  Shoot 'Em Up was very, very amusing to watch, as I did not expect such a caricature of the hero and anti-hero films. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 06:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, the Academy is actually composed of over 6,000 motion picture professionals (such as O'Connell himself), rather than critics, but do you really think that the best film/actor/technician always (or even usually) wins? Steve T • C 14:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry. Misunderstood. All the best, Steve  T • C 15:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Revert on Naval War
I didn't then, and don't now, think that the edit by the IP was a serious edit. Most people are aware that France and Great Britain are no longer engaged in a naval war with each other -- if the IP was serious he/she should have included a date when this ended. As it stood, it added absolutely nothing to the article. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

c/e
I've noticed some editors using that while editing Transformers (film) as edit summary. Mind telling me what it stands for? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there. C/E means copy edit. Copy editing is Fixing formatting etc. I hope this helps.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 19:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)