User talk:Bldon2

Your contributed article, World's Top 10 Fastest Supercomputers


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, World's Top 10 Fastest Supercomputers. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - TOP500. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at TOP500 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  " Pepper "  @ 21:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Below is info supporting my claim that Galicia in Spain shows higher frequency in r1b than that of the italian penisula:
 * look at the map showing 'European distribution of the R1b-M343 gene type':
 * http://jowsey.com/genealogy/GeneticGenealogy.html


 * look at the table showing Santiago de Compostela, Spain (in Galicia) compared with italy:
 * http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gallgaedhil/haplo_r1b_ht35_analysis.htm


 * look at this map showing European haplogroup heavily concentrated towards the west (including northern :Spain) and in the British Isles.
 * http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Graphics/Map-Distribution-of-R1b.html


 * and again:
 * http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/celts-descended-from-spanish-fishermen-study-:finds-416727.html


 * http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-406108/Ancient-Britons-come-mainly-Spain.html


 * Bldon2 (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

AN/I
You are mentioned at WP:AN/I. Skäpperöd (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)