User talk:Bleepbloop69

July 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to China Anne McClain have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: China Anne McClain was changed by Bleepbloop69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885131 on 2023-07-05T05:17:31+00:00


 * You can all suck small chinese dicks you commie lovers Bleepbloop69 (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Manticore  10:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Are my words not true? You should see her recent videos. Seems like you aren't fully aware on the topic. You shouldn't be reverting edits on topics you aren't aware of. Bleepbloop69 (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at China Anne McClain, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: China Anne McClain was changed by Bleepbloop69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900869 on 2023-07-06T08:04:03+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Unless you show me that what i am saying not factual then no. Bleepbloop69 (talk) 02:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, whether it's factual or not is irrelevant; what matters is if it is verified by secondary sources. And then we can decide on whether it's relevant. Also, it needs to be written up elegantly and fitted into the context of the article. Throwaway comments simply thrown in, that's always a no. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You sound like a Commie lover. Whether its a fact or not is irrelevant? Are you a fucking idiot? Looks and sounds like it. Bleepbloop69 (talk) 22:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Fuck you commie lover. The veil is lifting we know what the p3dos do in hollywood. Bleepbloop69 (talk) 22:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * 🖕🏻 Bleepbloop69 (talk) 22:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)