User talk:Blgoldberg4/sandbox

Emma's peer review
Overall, I think the structure and layout/timeline of this article is very logical.

All the Institute of Archaeology - Departments and Units links didn't work for me - it said that the page wasn't found. I think you should probably add a source to the Early life and education section because the reader doesn't know where that information is coming from.

You might want to expand on "the versatility of neanderthals," because though the source might explain it, it could help add more information to why her discovery was so important. Not everyone might know what that means. You could also expand on the types of fossils found, because what you have is pretty generic.

The source of paper was probably very useful and I like that you used a source that she actually wrote.

As for the rest of the sources, they all worked for me and I think they are reliable.

To add more, maybe you could expand on her departments that she has taught and if she has contributed anything to the subjects' research? You could also add more about her publications. Has she won any awards? Maybe you would want to add a picture(s) of her/ a picture of her doing her work?