User talk:BlindWorld

Welcome
 Hello BlindWorld, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

BlindWorld, good luck, and have fun. – Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Neda Agha-Soltan.jpg
The image is deliberately low resolution, to comply with the non-free content criteria. Non-free images should be kept small; if you have anyw questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Neda Agha-Soltan &
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Neda Agha-Soltan &

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you create this picture? As in, it was you who stood with them at that location with a camera? Or have you taken it from another website? J Milburn (talk) 10:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Neda Agha-Soltan & her fiance Caspian Makan.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neda Agha-Soltan & her fiance Caspian Makan.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Reliable source requirement for articles about living people
Hello, User:BlindWorld. I appreciate your interest in improving articles on Wikipedia, including Sami Yusuf. Unfortunately, I've had to remove the material you added from that particular article because of the strict requirements on articles about living people for high quality sourcing. Basically, if you don't add a reliable source to substantiate the information, we cannot include the content. You can see more about this at the "biographies of living persons" policy and the "identifying reliable sources" guideline. It can be frustrating having to do this when you know something is true, but it's essential for the legal protection of Wikipedia and for the protection of article subjects. I tried to find a "reliable" source to support this material, but just couldn't. All I found were blogs and open websites like our own, which are not usable for this kind of information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)