User talk:Blindvei

Welcome
 Hello Blindvei, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Blindvei, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Please read the guidelines, use your sandbox, and make sure your articles meet the criteria for inclusion before uploading them. Thanks. Deb (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * If you have any criticisms of my actions, please contact me via my talk page where everyone can see your comments. I will not respond to that kind of e-mail. Deb (talk) 08:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of European Conference of Reflexology


The article European Conference of Reflexology has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of European Conference of Reflexology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Conference of Reflexology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/European Conference of Reflexology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, not sure if I understand. The guidelines says: On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Does it mean that the information on the page should be included in another page? Blindvei

Wrong guy
Hi Blindvei, you just left a comment on my talk page, but actually it was Alexbrn who reverted your edit, not me - my name is shown because it was my last version of the page that he reverted to.

However - if I had seen your edit, I would also have reverted it. I'll try to explain why. First, it's ungrammatical. You were mixing up plural and singular forms, and using adjectives as adverbs. If the content was suitable for inclusion, I'd just have tidied it up rather than revert; however, it's also unsourced. If you want to say that there is no definition for reflexology, or discuss what it does and does not exclude, you will need a reliable source to back up your assertions. Finally, the reason that Alexbrn gave for reversion was 'editorializing' - that's to do with the style of writing you were using. You can read more about this at the manual of style WP:Editorializing. Hope that helps.Girth Summit (talk) 09:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)