User talk:Blissed123

License tagging for Image:Maxif5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maxif5.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. IrishGuy talk 17:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

My reversion of Max
The article you edited was a redirection page not meant for an article. In addition, the content you added was entirely your point of view, unsourced except with links that I suspect were of pornographic nature, and ultimately not suited for an encyclopedia.

I would invite you to read Wikipedia's Policies and Guidelines before making further contributions in order to avoid a similar situation in the future. — Dorvaq (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry it's the first page I've ever placed on Wikipedia so if possible I may need your advice, I orignated  the page as a redirection page by mistake and then  re-edited it and it  eventualy appeared. The subject matter is possibly challenging tho it is serious and is sex and the related human emotions that play a central part in everyones lives. Max and her colleagues (apart from 2 people) are all women, the sites they create are erotic but I couldn't really classify them as porn sites in the accepted sense, their about sexually empowering women and combating the mysogany and disrespect of pornographic text and the disrespect this society has towards sexual images. This is all discussed in the forums attached to the sites. a mature attitude to sex and love is very poorly reprisented on the net. Adult sex education and contemperary atitudes to sex are just as valid as historical documentation of these in ancient societies and those are all available in most encyclapedias. So I'll have to think again about how to introduce this subject in a mature way that provides a useful reference document.

Blissed123


 * I'd be delighted to provide you with advice if that is what you seek. Keep in mind, however, I don't make the rules and thus don't choose what remains on Wikipedia.  What I am trying to say is although your new article attempt may end up being very well written, the Wikipedia community ultimately has the last say and some may not feel as though your friend Max is a noteworthy enough person to deserve an article on her here.


 * Lastly, my main issue with your first attempt was that it was worded more like a personal webspace blog on a friend rather than as an encyclopedia entry. Take a look at other biographies categorized as Good articles found on wikipedia for a better idea on how to tackle your next attempt. — Dorvaq (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :)