User talk:Blitzbok

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bismarck du Plessis with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Millermk90 (talk) 04:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm, I don't know how well you know the game but I know these players extensively well. I have collected detailed statistics which varify what I wrote; have produced many detailed analysises which have included Bismarck. I'm not interested in portraying anything other than accuracy. That is afterall what Wikipedia is for - a resource for accurate information. My comment on Bismarck being erratic is supported by his consistently poor discipline, poor lineout throwing, non-effective play at the breakdown and poor handling in contact as well as weak scrummaging. The move for Smit to 3 and Bismarck at 2 was in fact abandoned as stated as an abject failure as it in fact significantly weakened the front row. Bismarck was thusly reduced to an impact role off the bench. Everything I stated was factually, acccurate and uptodate. I will happily take any challenge to what I wrote with all the statistical evidence and analysises I have at hand spanning the entirety of Bismarck's test career.