User talk:BlizzySway

'''Hi and welcome to my talk page where I rarely get any visitors. If you have a query or question regarding one of my edits, or simply want to comment something below, feel free and ask away. Please also try to avoid leaving template notices as well.'''

Welcome!
Hi CTRLminaj! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 01:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

February 2022.
I don't mean to talk about your edits overall, but your edit summary here raises some serious concerns about your credibility. And please read WP:WHATABOUTX. Other Wikipedia articles (unless they're FAs) do not set the rules for any given article. "Willow" is a good article and it has to be maintained that way. Coming to your concern ignoring your bias, yes, "Willow" indeed holds the record, a non-notable record. Read about what is undue in the lead section. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  08:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I respect your comment and I see my edit summary came off as passive aggressive and seemingly with bias against Swift, but I don't have anything against her specifically, or own a Twitter chart account. But I tend to notice a handful of editors (who heavily fan over Swift) repeatedly remove what I can call 'negative' chart information on her articles, and inflate her chart performance sections with positive wording. As for "Trollz" or "Move Ya Hips" for example, my edits on removing their large Hot 100 drops were reverted previously. However, I appreciate you tweaking both "Trollz" and "Heartless" so they no longer heavily focus on that in theirs. No hard feelings. CTRLminaj (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. So, next time, when you come across a factoid that is given undue weightage in the lead, try to remove/fix/rephrase it inside that article itself instead of attempting to level/"correct" other articles related to that factoid. Otherwise, you're violating WP:POINT. Read WP:HANDLE, which will be helpful to understand it better. Regards. Have a nice day.  ℛonherry  ☘  05:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Please stop accusing other random editors of "bias" as that is not good faith at all, which is one of the core values of this encyclopedia. shanghai. talk to me 00:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Cookie

 * , I appreciate it a lot! First ever cookie I received on here, and glad to see you standing your ground on your edits and reducing baseless additions to articles we both love. CTRLminaj (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you have a Discord or Twitter account? I'd love to chat with you more about Wikipedia stuff! I also invite you to join the WikiProject Women in hip hop music as it is a group of people dedicated to editing female hip hop articles. Thank you! shanghai. talk to me 12:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

invitation
You can join by signing ( ~ ) your name in the Members section of the page. Just something to consider! Thank you for your contributions. — VersaceSpace  🌃 22:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Traumazine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''As someone who's seen the mess on Twitter, it's easy to tell you've taken a side. I would suggest that you do not edit Megan Thee Stallion-related topics if you cannot keep a WP:NPOV. Or at least source your statements. Don't revert three times to add unsourced content to an article. This is the bare minimum.'' — VersaceSpace  🌃 19:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm looking through your other edits and at "Super Freaky Girl" you not only added chartdata as a source (not a verified account, therefore disallowed) but also ShadyNickiNews? What the hell? I can't believe you thought the latter was a good idea. A Young Money tweet as a reference is obviously not reliable for Nicki Minaj chart claims. All of that is removed now. Stop adding low quality sources to articles. — VersaceSpace  🌃 19:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I suggest you double-check what someone contributes before accusing them of adding garbage sources, as I never added any info relating to ShadyNickiNews or any of the iTunes mess either, and I can also assume I never added sources from the chartdata Twitter account since I don't know how to source those. Whenever I have added a source, it's always from the Billboard or official music sites. At times I simply reword what has already been added by other editors because the grammar is incorrect, but I'm still learning what is deemed a reputable and non-reputable source, so I leave it up to more experienced editors to actually remove anything they deem as unreliable. None of the info you took away from Super Freaky Girl was firstly contributed by me.Thank you though. BlizzySway (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * And I haven't taken sides between Megan and Nicki Minaj, I even edit Cardi articles and never take away or add shady/negative info to those. BlizzySway (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually you're right about the tweet stuff, you just changed the |title= parameter, sorry. The same still goes for the Traumazine edits though. — VersaceSpace  🌃 20:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)