User talk:Blloyd4444

SABMiller
I'm sorry, but I've had to revert your edit to SABMiller. In Wikipedia terms, this is a non-notable award for a non-notable beer - neither have articles on Wikipedia. And I'm sure more notable SABMiller beers have won more notable awards!

A better idea would be to think about starting pages for Zorok and The International Taste & Quality Institute, and then add mention of the award there. Edwardx (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

iTQi
I believe the award does have a page: Superior Taste Award The international taste and quality institute is simply the institute name. The Superior Taste Award is a very notable award but maybe the Zorok beer is not notable enough for the SABMiller webpage? In Vietnam this beer is very well-known. I am sorry to write on the page. However, please note; the Superior Taste Award is internationally known so it may be a good idea to have it on the SABMiller webpage to recognize that one of the beers in your portfolio received this accolade. My question is: why is the Zorok beer not "notable" enough.
 * When I stated that Zorok beer is not notable enough, I meant in Wikipedia terms, namely that it does not have its own page. You should refer to Notability for further guidance. And if you really are sorry to have written on the SABMiller page, why did you reinstate the content? Normal procedure here would be to raise such matters on the article's Talk page. Edwardx (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * So sorry. I have read the Notability article and I understand what you mean. I did not understand why Zorok was not notable but after reading I am fully up to speed! However, I am confused about the the reinstating of the content? I did not put the content back and I just checked the SABMiller page and it is not there anymore? If it was still there I am very sorry but I promise I did not write anything else. Thank you for referring me to the Notability . Have a great day and a happy holidays.


 * Thank you for taking the time to understand the policy. And you're right that it wasn't you who reinstated the content. Sorry about that. However, the content was reintroduced by IP address 91.183.8.163, also a Belgian IP address who only contributes to Superior Taste Award and adding iTQi information to other articles. So, it appears reasonable to infer that you are not unconnected. You really do need to address the preceived conflict of interest here. Otherwise, I will have to raise it at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and ask other editors for their view. Edwardx (talk) 13:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I thank you again for directing me to these policy's. To be honest, I am an intern at the company and took the personal initiative to write about the awards. I thought this would be beneficial for both parties and that I was doing a good job. Clearly, being 21 years old I thought doing this was a smart idea without looking at the possible consequences or regulations. I am very sorry and I will be withdrawing all of my contributions as I have made an error in judgement.


 * Your candour in this is most welcome and appreciated - we all make mistakes. I have heavily reworked the Superior Taste Award article in an effort to make it more balanced and encyclopaedic. If you have any issues with that, you should address them on the talk page for that article. Also, I have removed most of the mentions of this award from the various articles.Edwardx (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
I have noticed that all of your edits are adding details of iTQi awards to Wikipedia articles. Are you employed by this organistaion, or do you receive any payment from them? Have you read Conflict of interest, or Plain and simple conflict of interest guide? If not, I strongly recommend that you do so. And if there is a potential conflict of interest here, it is important that you declare it! Edwardx (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)