User talk:Bloggus1225

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Deuterocohnia lorentziana has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Deuterocohnia lorentziana was changed by Bloggus1225 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88658 on 2013-05-02T12:33:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Breeds Taskforce
Hello! I noticed you signed up for the Dog Breeds Task Force, and I just wanted to drop by to say hello and let you know that if you have any questions, all you have to do is ask! I'd be more than willing to answer them, and many other people around here are just as helpful! -- T K K  bark !  00:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scolopendra hardwickei


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. EuroCarGT 11:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Coespeletia palustris
Hello. I was recently examining this article, and I saw that most of the text was taken directly from the abstract of the paper in PhytoKeys describing it, with a word changed here and there. Please don't do that. This is called close paraphrasing, and may not be permitted under Wikipedia's policies on copyright and plagiarism. In this case, the text was licensed under CC-BY 3.0, which means that it could be reused—but only if the authors are attributed, which you didn't do. In general, please don't add content unless you can put it all in your own words, not just changing one or two words here and there. Choess (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pagophobia


A tag has been placed on Pagophobia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Dictionary definition of non-notable neologism

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dog Sense (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best-sellers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

No More Woof
Hi. Please add independent references to this article ASAP. Deb (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No More Woof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Device (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abigaille


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Abigaille requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Schwartzenberg (talk) 20:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of No More Woof for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No More Woof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/No More Woof until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rorshacma (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)